andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2018-03-29 12:00 pm

Interesting Links for 29-03-2018

cmcmck: (Default)

[personal profile] cmcmck 2018-03-29 11:11 am (UTC)(link)
I spent seven years in London so I get that comment entirely.
danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-03-29 11:46 am (UTC)(link)
I quite like the idea of restoring the walkway across Waverley Station although I think I'd prefer it if the whole station was roofed over and turned in to a public square - perhaps roofed over with a nice glass roof.
danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-03-29 12:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I reckon that a large part of the order of magnitude reduction in cost comes from sweating the assets. Which means fewer cars per capita (in the West) and slower growth in car numbers in the developing world. And probably less profitable car manufactures as cars shift to being a commodity with lifetime operating cost being the main determinate of purchase. No more handjobs from beautiful women in expensive cars.
danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-04-02 08:30 am (UTC)(link)
I'm sure they will get the kinks ironed out but I think it's going to take longer than the developers think and perhaps longer than their financiers lines of credit will last for some of them.

One of the most useful bits of wisdom I was given about technological innovation was this rule of thumb.

Getting a technology to the point where it is 80% ready will cost you one unit of time and one unit of money.

From 80% to 90% will cost you one unit of time and one unit of money.

From 90% to 95% ready, one unit of time, one unit of money.

95% to 98% ready, one unit of time, one unit of money.

98% to 99%, the same.

99% to 99.5%, again, one unit of time, one unit of money.

99.5% to 99.9% ready will again cost you one unit of money and one unit of time.

Now you might be able to sell things which are 80% ready but my guess is that for self-driving cars to be *fully* autonomous on a public highway then you are looking at the 99.9% readiness or more.

It's the reason why I generally think autonomous vehicles will arrive a bit more slowly than other people who are as supportive of them.
danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-04-02 08:38 am (UTC)(link)
90% there? Perhaps a bit more.

A while to go.

You can trade time for money a bit and accelerate the timelines but you can't speed up things like a test where the vehicle spends six months on the road with no software support.
danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-04-02 08:46 am (UTC)(link)
For example, to find out what happens when the owner doesn't update the software for six months because they've been busy or have sold their fleet to another operator who couldn't find the licence keys.

Or similar tests where elapsed time is important. How compromised is the autonomy if the LIDAR isn't calibrated for three or six or twelve months? Is the software able to optimise for reducing wear and tear over a two year period? What happens when the cars start going in to predominately British Asian neighbourhoods and 10% of the humans are wearing headresses and facial coverings - and you haven't recalibrated your LIDAR for six months or updated your software for three?
danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-04-02 09:01 am (UTC)(link)
Possibly, possibly they will.

Probably still need to test that sort of thing out in some depth.
momentsmusicaux: (Default)

[personal profile] momentsmusicaux 2018-03-29 12:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Realistically, I'm never going to manage to clean out rubber ducks. I can't even find time to stick the bathmats in the wash, and with those I can *see* that they're getting all mildewy underneath.
I try to squirt the dirty water out of bath toys into the washbasin most bathtimes. That's as good as it's going to get.
The kids will just have to cope with the germs.
They basically need to make toys that open up so you can clean them. We have a cloud toy that rains after you've dunked it, and because that's hard plastic, it's in two halves that pop open. Not that I remember to clean it, but I have done, and it's easy.

[personal profile] hutchingsmusic 2018-03-29 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I've stopped using bath toys that water can get into now, because I was able to squeeze out several chunks of mould from one recently.
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)

[personal profile] redbird 2018-03-29 01:48 pm (UTC)(link)
There's less than meets the eye in that "weirdest language" claim; he may be right about Piraha, or the one person in the world who speaks both Piraha and any other language might be lying or mistaken.

I'm skeptical partly because the article also claims that it's "impossible to learn" Sentinelese, which is true only in the sense that nobody has gotten to try, because the Sentinelese aren't speaking to anyone outside their group. "Impossible to learn" implies that if an outsider who is good at learning languages was working with a speaker of that language, they would be unable to learn it.

That said, if "weirdest language" is a meaningful claim (rather than subjective the way "tastiest food" is), it's possible that Piraha is the weirdest, and more likely than for (say) English, which is related to a lot of other known languages.
Edited 2018-03-29 13:51 (UTC)
liv: cast iron sign showing etiolated couple drinking tea together (argument)

[personal profile] liv 2018-03-29 05:17 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree really quite a lot with that Elledge article about Corbyn.
agoodwinsmith: (Default)

New squooshy organ all over.

[personal profile] agoodwinsmith 2018-03-29 06:21 pm (UTC)(link)
When I posted that news story on FB, one of my friends, who was a lab tech at UBC, said that she spent countless hours draining those structures of fluid in order to prepare microscope slide samples. So: we knew, but we already thought we knew what we knew. So: I wonder what else needs a new review from a new perspective? :)
agoodwinsmith: (Default)

automated taxis

[personal profile] agoodwinsmith 2018-03-29 06:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, no doubt if one stops having to pay drivers, one will reduce one's costs. However, I bet you a box of Girl Guide cookies that the first time I call one I will get one that has just been barfed in by the previous occupant.
agoodwinsmith: (Default)

Weighty tomes.

[personal profile] agoodwinsmith 2018-03-29 06:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I *really* like that it was "Being and Nothingness". :)
danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-03-30 08:19 am (UTC)(link)
I often thought about microwaving the Captain's rubber ducks in order to kill of any bugs or moulds inside them but prudence stopped me.