andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2010-07-19 12:01 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Delicious LiveJournal Links for 7-19-2010
-
Less painful, more effective, but I'd be worried about letting people do it at home, because I'm fairly sure a large chunk of them wouldn't.
no subject
Of course, if they've been abused, that's a very, very serious issue. But the piece didn't seem to offer evidence they had been.
(Also - if you're in a brawl, you may end up with the other guy in a headlock. It's probably a good thing if your self-defence manual has pointed out that you need to watch out for impeding their windpipe.)
no subject
no subject
One former manager of a secure children's home with almost 20 years' experience said the revelations were "horrifying" and described the self-defence techniques as "child abuse".
Malcolm Stevens, a former government policy adviser and director of secure training centres who helped to develop the government's guidance for staff working in secure centres during the 1990s, said he could not understand why pain-inducing techniques were endorsed. He said: "I have never seen the need to use pain-compliant techniques, and after 15 years my view has not changed. I have no truck with distraction techniques."
no subject
no subject
I don't think there's a simple solution, sadly.
no subject
Dating was really different in my day.
no subject
no subject
I don't really know what the atmosphere is like in these institutions - maybe serious violence almost never happens. I also don't know how these techniques compare against those used in adult prisons. However, I don't see why, on a practical level, defending yourself against or restraining a 17-year-old would be so different to doing the same against a 19-year-old.
(I'm going to ask a friend who has a lot more practical knowledge of these matters to comment.)
no subject
no subject
(Conversely, the incredibly juicy subject matter - the government! hurts! children! makes me a little skeptical quite how much steak there is behind the sizzle. The journalists involved have a much, much stronger incentive to find that there are horrible dark secrets in the document than they do to conclude it's basically OK.)
no subject
no subject
Presumably the wider point is that LGBT (and Black) sections of the bookshop are ghettoising and I agree with this. I do wonder if the books they contain would be stocked with out them though.
no subject
The gist, as far as I can remember, is that things get filed in the areas that publishers tell them to file them, and that publishers choose the areas that cause the most sales. In this case a feminist work was filed in the LGBT area, meaning that heterosexual feminists would be unable to find it.
See my other response for
no subject
I'm looking forward (in a sense) to accounts from ex-inmates.
no subject
The playground thing -- is it really a gender thing, or is it just rough kids vs quiet kids? Of course, it's a gender thing that more of the rough kids are boys. But their actual behaviour in their roughness I mean.
no subject
"If used in a true self defence context- ie with force proportionate to the attack - these are appropriate techniques. If you're being pinned or held then you need to use pain based attacks to get released- simple.
If used incorrectly or out of appropriate context then it is abuse. Just as if someone went for a copper with a knife he can use his baton(which will hurt and may lead to possibility of death even if used in the manner trained to be less than lethal), but if the copper just hits a person because he feels like it, or they simply moved too fast for his liking, it then it is wrong."
He goes on to say that these techniques are listed as being adapted from adult prison restraint techniques (""General service techniques") and says "bear in mind that in adult settings they use batons, body arnour and shields too so this is a medium suitable to the setting. An aggrieved 17 year old is no differnt from an aggrieved 30 year old. I've been belted on the chin at work by a 14 year old and it was no differnt from being belted on the chin by a fully grown adult."
Of course, the sticking point is that these will be used on children, and interestingly he also says that a lot of bouncers refuse to work under-18 clubs, because "It gets trickier when they are 12 as they can do as much damage to you as you can do to them; but when it goes wrong it goes really wrong. This is why lot of doorstaff refuse to do under-18 nightclubs as the risk of being charged by people who don't understand this is far too great."
no subject
no subject
I just read a similar article about how gay and trans-gendered kids are abused by the system.
It's not wonder they come out more fucked up than when they went in.