andrewducker: (Portal!)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2010-05-06 09:09 am

Good Lord

I just noticed that Avatar is _still_ in the cinemas in the US - leading it to hit #12 on the all-time box-office charts (inflation adjusted). It's just crept passed The Empire Strikes Back, but it's never going to beat 101 Dalmatians. Titanic is, of course, still well ahead of it. The only other film of the last 20 years in the top 20 is The Phantom Menace.

[identity profile] a-pawson.livejournal.com 2010-05-06 08:40 am (UTC)(link)
Avatar was released in the USA on 16th December. I'm curious to know exactly who is still going to see it. I can understand wanting to avoid the packed cinemas when it first came out, but if you wanted to see it, you have had almost 5 months in which to do so. Boggles.

[identity profile] nancylebov.livejournal.com 2010-05-06 09:07 am (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't be surprised if it's mostly people who want to see it again and again.

[identity profile] poisonduk.livejournal.com 2010-05-06 09:10 am (UTC)(link)
still haven't seen it.

[identity profile] lpetrazickis.livejournal.com 2010-05-06 09:34 am (UTC)(link)
I think it's supposed to be re-released in IMAX 3D this summer because it didn't get a full run in the medium. That will add to the total.

[identity profile] kurosau.livejournal.com 2010-05-06 12:13 pm (UTC)(link)
And that's one of the reasons that the inflation adjusted total isn't a great tracker of film success. Theirs in particular doesn't parse out multiple releases, nor any sort of promotional hoohah, or release periods. If Avatar stayed in the theater twice as long as anything else, then it'd make a poor comparison.