Thwipp!

[andrewducker]

[Poll #980396]

Comments

[nancylebov.livejournal.com]

It was somewhat better than awful, but not as good as ok.

The special effects (especially Sandman) were excellent. Better than that in Sandman's case. But the people stuff was sub-average, and I found myself not caring about any of them about three-quarters of the way through the movie.

People were popping up out of their seats before it was over--there's a scene that looks like the end, but there's one more scene.

[andabusers.livejournal.com]

I will be celebrating the completion of my last ever undergraduate assessment with people on my course, after 8 hours of listening to people's dissertation's presentations (and, y'know, giving my own). :)

[ashfae.livejournal.com]

Really it was Fun rather than Great, but that'll do. Some terrible bits but oh so very shiny.

[surliminal.livejournal.com]

Might go tomorrow to the cinema round the corner and see it in Spanish :-)

[holyoutlaw.livejournal.com]

I like that icon. I also like the comic it comes from, which I could well have gotten from a recommendation in your pages. pixels. whatever.

[sterlingspider.livejournal.com]

Movie was shiny and very gripping, if not grand cinema.
Audience reaction to a specific scene still has me shaken though.

[jccw.livejournal.com]

Should be able to make it.

[soon_lee]

It was o.k. The eye-candy was very nice as befits the budget. I have liked that characters in this franchise are not immune to death, unlike the case in comics.

It's amazing how audience reaction can completely alter the tone of a scene (referring to Bernard).

Parts of it came across as supers-group-therapy; too much angsting.

There were cringeworthy bits (uh, Travolta).

It was a satisfying ending.

I think three is a good number and that they should stop now.