andrewducker: (cute)
[personal profile] andrewducker
Go here and enter your salary.  Then feel slightly guilty for outearning a large chunk of the population of the world.

For the record I'm 13.69% down the population of the UK, and 2.25% down the population of the planet.

(Oh, gnacked from [livejournal.com profile] missedith01)

Date: 2006-01-05 09:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heron61.livejournal.com
Converting my income to pounds, even I'm in the top half for the UK, which definitely surprises me. I feel rich :)

Date: 2006-01-05 09:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thadrin.livejournal.com
There's surely no way on earth that pulling in 18 grand a year can have me in the top 23% for the UK...unless this counts Schoolkids, babies and pensioners.

Date: 2006-01-05 09:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kellibunny.livejournal.com
There are 42 million poorer than me in the UK. Crazy.

What's odd to me is when i clicked the link to show who is making what, they didn't have a number for female police officers, financial managers or doctors. You guys don't like girls over there? :)

Date: 2006-01-05 10:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] momlady.livejournal.com
At $2600 a year (and I did worldwide), it still put me in the top 14%...this doesn't make much sense unless they're also using children in the test and not just "working" population....And at that "annual" rate, how can there be 5 billion people worse off than me? Yikes! That's too strange for me. However, I will take the other two memes soon... and that should be interesting.

:-)

Date: 2006-01-05 10:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] allorin.livejournal.com
9.43% UK, and 0.99% Worldwide.

And dude, that just scared the shit out of me.

Date: 2006-01-05 11:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] allorin.livejournal.com
"Richer" isn't really accurate - just because your gross salary is greater, doesn't mean your bottom line is.

Though, I freely admit, pretty much 95%+ of people in the US/UK are probably better of than about half the global population. Heck, just think of the Chinese.

Date: 2006-01-06 12:22 am (UTC)
ext_16733: (Default)
From: [identity profile] akicif.livejournal.com
It's broken: £4777 as the UK median income? I think not.

Date: 2006-01-06 07:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] azalemeth.livejournal.com
I thought the average working UK salary was £25,000 odd....

At any rate, entering what I would get if I worked full time put me in the single digit percentages O_o...

Date: 2006-01-06 10:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stillcarl.livejournal.com
It might be, but the average wage doesn't mean there'll be 50% above it and 50% below.

Three people...

A: 10000
B: 20000
C: 60000

The average wage in that group is 30000.

Date: 2006-01-06 11:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-pawson.livejournal.com
I put in my salary and am apparently am in the top 11.17% of the population, something I find very hard to believe.

According to the office for national statistics, the mean average salary in the UK is £23,400 and the median is £18,961.

Since I earn only a few thousand little over the national average wage, being in the top 12% clearly makes no sense unless the highest earners are on so much that they are able to skew the statistics by such a large margin.

The discrepancy lies in the way the statistics have been prepared. The NSO figures are based only on employed people, and while they do include part-time workers, they do not include people who earn nothing at all, which must be a significant percentage of the population (housewives, children, pensioners, the unemployed etc.)

The channel 4 site is basing it's values on the entire UK population, which includes people with no income. Input a salary of £1 and you are still in the top 50%!

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 56 7
8 91011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 9th, 2026 06:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios