andrewducker (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
andrewducker) wrote2005-06-14 08:39 pm
andrewducker) wrote2005-06-14 08:39 pm
Papers
The front of every tabloid this morning was the Jackson trial, which I have zero interest in.
The Guardian was covering some kind of sporting event, about which I care even less.
The Independent led with the world first of brain cells being created in a laboratory, which is likely to be very good news (in the long term) for an awful lot of people and lead to huge medical advantages.
I feel vaguely smug about my choice of paper.
The Guardian was covering some kind of sporting event, about which I care even less.
The Independent led with the world first of brain cells being created in a laboratory, which is likely to be very good news (in the long term) for an awful lot of people and lead to huge medical advantages.
I feel vaguely smug about my choice of paper.
no subject
Warren Ellis says interesting things quite a lot, and Neil Gaiman forwards on interesting links and mentions of his new projects (both of which I find interesting). I do know that I've mentioned TheFerrett at least twice this week to people, but that is, admittedly, rarer.
Also, saying "Neil Gaiman was writing about X" needs no explanation for most of my friends. Saying "TheFerrett, who is this guy off of LJ, was writing about X" usually makes for odd looks, and is therefore likely to be mentioned less.
And I can't imagine who I'v ementioned either Gaiman or Ellis to who'd have no knowledge of the names. I possibly have, but I'd tend to only use them when talking to non-work people, who generally are comics reading freaks.