andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2005-06-14 08:39 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Papers
The front of every tabloid this morning was the Jackson trial, which I have zero interest in.
The Guardian was covering some kind of sporting event, about which I care even less.
The Independent led with the world first of brain cells being created in a laboratory, which is likely to be very good news (in the long term) for an awful lot of people and lead to huge medical advantages.
I feel vaguely smug about my choice of paper.
The Guardian was covering some kind of sporting event, about which I care even less.
The Independent led with the world first of brain cells being created in a laboratory, which is likely to be very good news (in the long term) for an awful lot of people and lead to huge medical advantages.
I feel vaguely smug about my choice of paper.
no subject
--
Would you have cared more about the Jackson trial if he'd been found guilty? Personally I'm glad he wasn't guilty and I'm glad that his innocence is getting so much attention. Anyone who's been accused of something so awful deserves at least 24 hours of media support. Now I hope he can concentrate on a producing role and put everything, including Neverland, behind him.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
As far as I am aware it is very rare for a jury to be allowed to explain themselves in this way. What they said restores a fair bit of my faith in jury trials as they seem to have managed to cut through all the hype, celebrity and hysteria, and got down to actually making sense of the evidence.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Go read The Sun tomorra. :)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)