andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2024-06-11 12:00 pm

Interesting Links for 11-06-2024

calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2024-06-11 11:37 am (UTC)(link)
10) Well, yes, the main point is absolutely true that the Conservatives have returned after every time they've imploded. But some of the instances are off:

The only reason they returned to office in 1834 is because the king fired their Whig opponents. (Peel, their leader, was so not expecting this that he was off on vacation in Italy at the time. Pre-telegraph and pre-railroads it took 3 weeks to fetch him back, and an awkward interregnum intervened.) Despite calling an election, he was unable to obtain a majority, and within months gave up and the Whigs resumed office. That was the last time the monarch tried dismissing a government, unless you count governor-generals in Canada in 1926 and Australia in 1975.

The Conservative government in 1852 likewise was only formed because everyone else had had a try, and only lasted a few months without a majority. It didn't help that their inexperienced Chancellor, Benjamin Disraeli, had no idea what he was doing. His budget was demolished by the opposition spokesman, William Gladstone, and a 30-year feud took off.

The reason the Conservatives returned to office in 1915 (not 1916) is because the Liberal government decided it was better to pursue World War I with a national coalition. It was rather like the situation when Labour returned to office for similar reasons in 1940.
cmcmck: (Default)

[personal profile] cmcmck 2024-06-11 05:31 pm (UTC)(link)
The Romans had reds,blues and greens (chariot racing fans) who caused all manner of trouble.
snippy: Lego me holding book (Default)

3. Keanu Reeves

[personal profile] snippy 2024-06-12 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
I don't want him as a boyfriend, I want him as a cousin or nephew. Brother would be okay, too.