simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)

[personal profile] simont 2023-11-02 03:24 pm (UTC)(link)
#8: off the top of my head, my first thought is that that need not be a contradiction at all.

There's a large class of things that improve the experience of the person doing them, but worsen the experience of people in general. Namely, anything with significant externalised costs, so that doing the thing is selfish, benefiting you at the expense of those around you. I wouldn't go as far as to say that religion is necessarily one of those, but it certainly seems to me that some forms of religion can be; most obviously, the ones that include intolerance or bigotry in their belief systems, or just in their in-practice behaviour.

The article also mentions that religious countries have lower wellbeing overall, but also a higher contrast between the wellbeing of their religious and non-religious inhabitants. That could very easily be translated as "being a Religious Country is mildly good for the people sharing that religion, and seriously bad for the people who don't, averaging out to a net loss."
adrian_turtle: (Default)

[personal profile] adrian_turtle 2023-11-02 05:17 pm (UTC)(link)
The article also mentions that the less religious countries tend to be wealthier. While money doesn't buy happiness, exactly, poverty often causes unhappiness and anxiety. It's not clear to what extent a religious country is less wealthy, considering how many religions order their adherents to do no work one day each week. (Hard to tell, as some such countries are located on top of enormous oil reserves.)