andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2021-10-14 12:00 pm
original_aj: (Default)

[personal profile] original_aj 2021-10-14 12:10 pm (UTC)(link)
OK, I forgive Russell T Davies for what he did to Dr Who.
channelpenguin: (Default)

[personal profile] channelpenguin 2021-10-14 12:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmm. Doesnt say about AZ - Moderna, like I had...
dewline: Text - "On the DEWLine" (Default)

[personal profile] dewline 2021-10-14 01:05 pm (UTC)(link)
1. Gee, I guess pulling out of the EU to protect money-launderers has consequences. Right?

2. See point 1.

4. + 5. Liking this reaction to Kathleen Stock and the LGB Alliance. A lot.

6. His past conduct as showrunner aside, this definitely matters and it especially matters now.

7. Terrifying.
chess: (Default)

[personal profile] chess 2021-10-14 03:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Re Ring cameras: as usual the actual story is more complicated - the ruling wasn't just about a basic Ring camera pointed at a shared area, it was a huge set of various cameras over a lot of shared areas with precise audio pickup over them all.

Your standard Ring camera pointed at a reasonable area outside your front door is fine, because both the relevant legislation and the ruling (which isn't binding on any other court anyway) accept you have a legitimate interest in data collection from that area.

Source:

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/uk-news/warning-anyone-ring-doorbell-after-21845329?__vfz=medium%3Dcomment_share%7Csharer_uuid%3D00000000-0000-4000-8000-0378dab17086#vf-d25918d6-f6a6-465e-b04d-5a27335f0c17
Edited 2021-10-14 15:09 (UTC)
emperor: (Default)

[personal profile] emperor 2021-10-14 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)
...and a pile of harrassment and lying. The reportage of this case has been pretty rubbish (which is presumably why you can now read the judgment, which paints are rather different picture)