andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2020-09-14 12:00 pm
jack: (Default)

How to tell hard sciences from soft ones

[personal profile] jack 2020-09-14 12:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Soft sciences are often scary not for what people successfully achieve but for what people try to do with them, eg eugenics.

Re: How to tell hard sciences from soft ones

[personal profile] anna_wing 2020-09-15 03:44 am (UTC)(link)
Would eugenics count as a soft science? Gene editing is definitely hard science.
jack: (Default)

Re: How to tell hard sciences from soft ones

[personal profile] jack 2020-09-15 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Hm, yes. I guess I don't mean eugenics IS a soft science, but that when people imagine a mad scientist physicist they imagine them building a doomsday machine, but when people imagine a mad scientist anthropologist, they imagine them doing lots of harm TRYING to do eugenics, whether or not they actually have the tools to succeed.

Re: How to tell hard sciences from soft ones

[personal profile] anna_wing 2020-09-16 06:12 am (UTC)(link)
Ah, I see. Also I suppose in affecting local societal definitions of 'eugenics'.
Edited 2020-09-16 06:13 (UTC)