andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2020-09-14 12:00 pm
calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2020-09-14 11:38 am (UTC)(link)
I realize this is offtopic, but what is the extraordinary dialect of the speaker in the Withdrawal Agreement video? I have never heard anybody talk like that before, so I wonder where it's from. In particular, at least some of the time the speaker pronounces "island" and "Ireland" identically.
calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2020-09-14 05:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Stronger? Much weaker, I'd say; and yes, I've encountered people who talk roughly like that. But I'd never heard anybody who sounds remotely like David Allen Green.
wildeabandon: picture of me (Default)

[personal profile] wildeabandon 2020-09-14 05:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Just listening to it, whilst he has a fairly mild Brummie accent, he's also th-fronting, which isn't part of that accent, and I suspect its the combination of the two that you're finding unusual.
calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2020-09-14 06:27 pm (UTC)(link)
That could be part of it, but even that's extended: I hear him pronouncing "the" as "vee" (0.31) which seems to me to extend the bounds of th-fronting beyond the normal: first that it's an initial th instead of the customary final one (which he also does), and also that it's a voiced v instead of an unvoiced f. Other times his "the" is even harder to parse (0.20), but on other occasions he pronounces "the" normally.

But there's lots more. One is the extraordinary things he does with "r". Most people with trouble pronouncing r render it as something like w, but he doesn't do that. He half-swallows it instead, and then half-unswallows it where it doesn't belong, which is what makes his "island" and "Ireland" identical (see 0.43).

Another particularly odd thing from the beginning is his vowel in "does" (see 0.24). If this is part of the Birmingham dialect, it's much stronger from him than from the sample Andrew provided.

I could hunt through it for more, but that's enough to make the point that this is an accent unlike any I'd ever heard.
Edited 2020-09-14 18:33 (UTC)
jack: (Default)

How to tell hard sciences from soft ones

[personal profile] jack 2020-09-14 12:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Soft sciences are often scary not for what people successfully achieve but for what people try to do with them, eg eugenics.

Re: How to tell hard sciences from soft ones

[personal profile] anna_wing 2020-09-15 03:44 am (UTC)(link)
Would eugenics count as a soft science? Gene editing is definitely hard science.
jack: (Default)

Re: How to tell hard sciences from soft ones

[personal profile] jack 2020-09-15 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Hm, yes. I guess I don't mean eugenics IS a soft science, but that when people imagine a mad scientist physicist they imagine them building a doomsday machine, but when people imagine a mad scientist anthropologist, they imagine them doing lots of harm TRYING to do eugenics, whether or not they actually have the tools to succeed.

Re: How to tell hard sciences from soft ones

[personal profile] anna_wing 2020-09-16 06:12 am (UTC)(link)
Ah, I see. Also I suppose in affecting local societal definitions of 'eugenics'.
Edited 2020-09-16 06:13 (UTC)
cmcmck: (Default)

[personal profile] cmcmck 2020-09-14 01:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmmm!

When I came out to mine, they threw me out.

I was fifteen..........