andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2020-05-21 12:00 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Interesting Links for 21-05-2020
- Why do some COVID-19 patients infect many others, whereas most don't spread the virus at all?
- (tags:virus pandemic )
- Why do some COVID-19 patients infect many others, whereas most don't spread the virus at all?
- (tags:pandemic virus )
- I am very curious as to how this letter from Michel Barnier is landing with the government
- (tags:UK Europe Doom )
- The Economics of Jane Austen's World
- (tags:janeausten economics )
- Billions of pounds worth of clothes made in Bangladesh have been cancelled by UK stores. Buy a box half price and help support workers in crisis
- (tags:clothing business pandemic )
- Marching Band Sound Delay: Drum Major selective hearing 'cuz physics
- (tags:physics sound music speed )
- Denmark is opening its schools. Here's what they're doing differently to the UK
- (tags:Denmark schools UK pandemic )
- Love Can't Make You a Villain: How She-Ra's Catra Helped Make Sense of My Heart
- (tags:relationships emotion TV )
- Graduate Student Solves Decades-Old Conway Knot Problem
- (tags:mathematics )
- Mount Everest Is Visible from Kathmandu, Nepal for First Time in Living Memory
- (tags:Everest Nepal pollution pandemic )
- I would like to live in this surprising house
- (tags:housing awesome )
- Why Small Children Struggle With Colour Names
- (tags:psychology children colour )
- Roleplaying Games vs. Storytelling Games
- (tags:games roleplaying storytelling )
no subject
In support of this I pray in aid the "fact" that a) interest bearing government debt as an investment vehicle with the interest service paid for by income tax was relatively new thing in Georgian Britain and b) the British economy in Georgian times was still not a fully market economy - in that not all goods, services or commodities were bought and sold - and that particularly in the country there were still fuedal-like economic transfers going on eg Darcey might have a large estate which allowed him to keep lots of servants and have nice things but that mostly those servants were paid for with a physical share of the estates' surplus agricultural output. Putting it another way, Darcy didn't buy his horse or food for the horse, or the tack for the horse or repairs to the stables - they all came from his estate. I'm not sure how much selling of agriculture there actually was compared to in situ consumption.
I think in 1815 most people still lived and worked in the country but that was about to change and part of the change was a more fluid market for food etc.
But I may be making all of that up inside my head.
Anyhow, £10,000 a year is enough money that he doesn't *have* to care much what anyone thinks of his behaviour.