andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2019-09-05 12:01 pm
danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2019-09-05 12:56 pm (UTC)(link)
I think many people do not understand how painful "burning everything to the ground" actually is. They might want to have a conversation with a 95 year-old Pole and see how bad it actually is.
danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2019-09-05 01:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think the Scottish Forward Self-Defence Force has plans to liberate Cornwall until after hostilities have ceased.
channelpenguin: (Default)

[personal profile] channelpenguin 2019-09-05 01:19 pm (UTC)(link)
why Cornwall in particular?

But seriously, surely anarchy/chaos only ever appeals to young, physically fit males who currently have very little societal status/power/money. At least they are, IMO, some the few groups for whom the possible gains might outweigh the losses ...
nancylebov: (green leaves)

[personal profile] nancylebov 2019-09-05 02:26 pm (UTC)(link)
I know at least one older man who wants it all to burn.

It's possible that it's mostly because of him being in a bureaucratic trap of not being able to work for money because that would end his government aid.
skington: (yaaay murder)

[personal profile] skington 2019-09-05 07:34 pm (UTC)(link)
I assume because Cornwall is (comparatively) dirt poor and gets loads of EU subsidies as a result. Which a Boris Johnson government is hardly inclined to match.
liv: Cartoon of a smiling woman with a long plait, teaching about p53 (teacher)

[personal profile] liv 2019-09-05 04:23 pm (UTC)(link)
That study about active learning is foundational to the project I was working on for the past couple of years, so it's kind of fascinating to see it summarized on Ars Technica!
liv: Cartoon of a smiling woman with a long plait, teaching about p53 (teacher)

[personal profile] liv 2019-09-06 12:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, I didn't carry out the study, sorry to be unclear. The existence of that study, and a few others like it, provided the foundational evidence which allowed my uni to apply for a government grant to change the whole university over to active learning. And part of that grant paid my salary for two years; my job was to train academics into how to do active learning well, and to carry out research to see if our approach to active learning was working. Including when active learning is a normal everyday thing that everybody just routinely does, not a special experimental set-up like in that study.
anef: (Default)

[personal profile] anef 2019-09-07 08:37 am (UTC)(link)
I feel sorry for the peole whose garden is to be overshadowed by a massive office block. It isn't clear from the article whether the developers are obliged to pay for them to move somewhere else (I appreciate that they don't want to) but I would hope that they are. I wish them the best with their campaign.
fiddlingfrog: (Default)

Re: Phones that listen

[personal profile] fiddlingfrog 2019-09-13 12:21 pm (UTC)(link)
I've been thinking and I believe there's a couple of flaws in the study about the phones listening to people. First, and the more major one, is that the researchers only tested major-brand apps. The problem, if it exists, likely stems from a rogue app like a game or camera or something like that, an app that makes you think "I just want to make a duck noise on command, why do you need access to my location, camera, and microphone?"
Secondly, instead of playing existing advertising the researchers should have used a script of people in conversation where the speaker's "new car" was mentioned prominently. Sub in new dog, new cat, new house, new baby, etc... to test if these made any difference. If these apps really are listening in, then I would imagine the processing is set to ignore existing advertising - I hear adverts all the time for products I'm not interested in, but words that I speak for myself are more likely to be things I'm interested in.