andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2019-03-29 03:06 pm
claudeb: A white cat in purple wizard robe and hat, carrying a staff with a pawprint symbol. (Default)

[personal profile] claudeb 2019-03-29 04:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Knocked it out of the park today. The links about gaming culture and positivity are most welcome. (A friend was tweeting about the former issue just this morning; I was wondering what the matter was.) As for LGBT education being introduced in UK schools, this tweet just crossed my timeline, and I couldn't possibly say it better.
chickenfeet: (widmerpool)

[personal profile] chickenfeet 2019-03-29 05:56 pm (UTC)(link)
And the Sultan of Brunei is maintained in power by a British garrison
calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2019-03-29 07:01 pm (UTC)(link)
The "Democracy is" sequence was good. Once I figured out from the pun what the "free breadsticks" one referred to, I was rolling around laughing at the sheer brilliant aptness of it.

Agree also with the "Asking the people around you" one. It was 15 years ago that I first suggested to my literary society that, if it wants to evaluate how well it's serving its membership, it should ask not its current members but those who have recently dropped out, and those who've come to our conferences but not joined the society - names and addresses for these people should be easily extractable from our records. But so far as I know they never took me up on this idea.
mountainkiss: (Default)

[personal profile] mountainkiss 2019-03-30 10:16 am (UTC)(link)
It's never a good idea to tell other people what to think. But I'd have to say that positivity saved my life rather than ruining it, so I think this is more nuanced and complex than that article suggests.
mountainkiss: (Default)

[personal profile] mountainkiss 2019-04-07 03:31 pm (UTC)(link)

It is certainly true to say that pretending a difficult circumstance is positive is not likely to be psychologically healthy if it means suppressing and not dealing with problems or feelings.

It is also true to say that it's insulting and demeaning to another person to dismiss their response and overwrite it with one of your own.

However it's also true that in many circumstances, a lot of our pain is vested in the emotional dynamics of our response, and to varying degrees this is something that we can change, through how we choose to relate to it or the stories we tell ourselves or where we put our attention. That includes making a decision about how positively or negatively we are going to regard things.

I do not tell people that the main problem lies in how they feel unless they are paying me a significant hourly rate or have directly asked me for my advice or are married to me. However, it is nonetheless true that over the course of my last decade or so in this work, far more of the problems and pain I have come across have been located in the individual's response than in the circumstance, and to the extent that they have been able to do this work, they have increased their well-being. I learned in early recovery to concentrate never on the circumstance and always on what I could do with my own thoughts in order to to alleviate my suffering (or in many cases do no more than endure it with grace and maturity). That has almost universally been a better plan than trying to change the circumstance, simply because so much more of the problem lay there. I would not regard this as a universal rule, but I think it is true sufficiently frequently that I would be uncomfortable with the reverse generalisation.

momentsmusicaux: (Default)

[personal profile] momentsmusicaux 2019-04-01 06:34 am (UTC)(link)
what3words -- OMG what crazy bullshit is this?