channelpenguin: (Default)

[personal profile] channelpenguin 2019-02-05 02:51 pm (UTC)(link)
assuming we retain enough medtech for effective contraception, and societies continue to give women universal access to it ... neither of which is a given.
danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2019-02-05 03:10 pm (UTC)(link)
How are you thinking we might lose the medical technology for effective contraception?
channelpenguin: (Default)

[personal profile] channelpenguin 2019-02-05 03:17 pm (UTC)(link)
any number of doomsday scenarios ... but I suppose they all reduce the human population drastically anyway.

lack of universal access is the more likely threat (see the USA)
Edited 2019-02-05 15:18 (UTC)
haggis: (Default)

[personal profile] haggis 2019-02-05 06:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Leaving aside the doomsday scenarios (which are not included in the UN models or the models in the Wired article) ...

I do not believe even wannabe theocrats like Pence can substantially roll back the consistent and global demographic changes that are lowering birth rate. They are having some success at reducing access to legal abortion services in the US but since both demand and the technologies exist, abortion will continue to be available, even if it is DIY or illegal or requires a trip abroad/out of state. Abortion pills can be sent by post which is really hard to block. To be brutal, backstreet abortions have a much higher risk of complications that cause infertility or even death - which reduces the birthrate.

Abortion access is being reduced in the US - lots of other jurisdictions are widening it eg Ireland, IoM and several South American countries. Apart from the US, I believe abortion is most restricted in countries where the Catholic Church has a strong influence. That influence is being drastically reduced by the revelations about abuse cover-ups.

The hardcore theocrats want to reduce access to contraception but that will be an even harder sell outside their clique. If it passes, I would foresee a thriving black market and the law being routinely flouted.

Finally, theocrats like Pence are also white supremacists. Their concern is white women breeding and everyone else deported or sterilised. So even if they acquire the power to ban contraception, they are not interested in increasing the global birthrate, just the birthrate in specific locations.
elf: CG rendering of internal erect clitoris (Internal)

[personal profile] elf 2019-02-05 07:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Even without medical tech, just information about how fertility actually works will keep pregnancies lower. "Natural family planning" hasn't got the reliability rate of condoms or pills, but it works a whole lot better than the "hope and prayer" method that's used in communities that don't understand biology, or that forbid women to have any control over when they have sex.

Just the basic awareness of "there's usually a 3-5 day per month fertility stretch for women, often located opposite the start of the period on a calendar" is enough to help.

There's reasons that increasing education lowers birth rates, even in impoverished areas that have very little access to modern tech.