andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2018-10-16 12:00 pm

Interesting Links for 16-10-2018

mountainkiss: (Default)

[personal profile] mountainkiss 2018-10-17 03:33 pm (UTC)(link)

That's... everyone.

danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-10-17 03:34 pm (UTC)(link)
The evidence suggests that not everyone is smart enough to spot that Johnson is up to something.
mountainkiss: (Default)

[personal profile] mountainkiss 2018-10-17 03:35 pm (UTC)(link)

That is a fair comment, albeit that I'd like to think that people who make it into the House of Commons are. I think there's a third group that you're overlooking: people who know exactly what he's doing but think he can benefit somehow. I also am not entirely certain that he himself is fully cognisant of what he is doing.

danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-10-17 03:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Those are all fair points.

The most worrying of which is that Johnson, himself, doesn't fully appreciated what a crooked, twisted, tangled path he is treading and genuinely thinks he is a Great Man in the Churchillian archetype.
mountainkiss: (Default)

[personal profile] mountainkiss 2018-10-17 03:40 pm (UTC)(link)

My first point is obviously wrong - the Bridgens, Jenkynses etc. do not hit the intelligence standard I ascribe for MPs.

danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-10-17 03:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Intelligence is a desirable quality for a candidate for MP, but not an essential one. The essential quality is electabiity.
mountainkiss: (Default)

[personal profile] mountainkiss 2018-10-17 03:40 pm (UTC)(link)

Also, confusing typo: think they can benefit somehow.

danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-10-17 03:58 pm (UTC)(link)
That's the key danger that some (incompetent) tries to game Johnson's (incompetent) gaming of the system.