andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2018-10-16 12:00 pm

Interesting Links for 16-10-2018

danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-10-16 11:24 am (UTC)(link)
Anyone fancy entering the holiday letting business on Shetland?
nancylebov: (green leaves)

[personal profile] nancylebov 2018-10-16 11:38 am (UTC)(link)
That Rand piece has a highly inaccurate picture of Rand's ideas, but it's probably no more inaccurate than some of her fan's ideas of her ideas.

As a minor point to show how sloppy the reading was, John Galt was an inventor, not an entrepreneur. For that matter Dagny Taggart was the Operating Vice President of an company started by her grandfather.

Rand doesn't recommend unfettered selfishness, she's got a good bit about rational selfishness requiring ethical treatment of other people.
cmcmck: (Default)

[personal profile] cmcmck 2018-10-16 11:43 am (UTC)(link)
Davis?

We're doomed!
doug: (Default)

David Davis lined up as interim prime minister

[personal profile] doug 2018-10-16 11:46 am (UTC)(link)
It mostly looks like it's David Davis who is lining him up as interim prime minister.

Not Proven verdict

[personal profile] nojay 2018-10-16 12:27 pm (UTC)(link)
I didn't really want to talk about this but...

I was on a jury recently at the High Court in Edinburgh in a case about rape among other things. We ended up acquitting the defendant in the actual rape charges but we brought back "not proven" verdicts in several sexual assault charges.

The accusers in the sexual assault charges were credible in the witness box but they weren't credible enough to convict according to the rules of evidence. The Crown relied on a series of interlocking and supporting statements of evidence from several people and there was a relationship problem with one of them which meant we couldn't in all honesty convict the person on any of those charges.

My personal opinion was that the person was guilty of the sexual offences charges but that didn't count, not in court. The "not proven" verdict meant they walked free but it showed the jury's belief that there was something to the charges.

As an aside the rape charges fell apart as soon as we heard all the evidence. Day 1 we were ready to lock them up and throw away the key. By day 5 none of the fifteen people in the jury room thought the rape charges were credible, and that's after being exposed to the defence's testimony which did not make the defendant look good at all.
Edited (Fixing capitalisation) 2018-10-16 12:27 (UTC)
drplokta: (Default)

[personal profile] drplokta 2018-10-16 12:57 pm (UTC)(link)
"Scottish Power to use 100% wind power" isn't really correct. "Scottish Power to generate 100% wind power" is closer to the mark. They'll be buying and using lots of power from other companies at times when the wind isn't blowing.
danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-10-16 02:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Can you imagine David Davis' cabinet picks and the people who would be willing to serve in a David Davis government?