andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2018-01-29 12:00 pm

Interesting Links for 29-01-2018

danieldwilliam: (Default)

Re: 50% of the population

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-01-29 02:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Thinking about it over lunch I think the circle from Dundee would get to about the edge of the London circle.

If that London circle has half the population of the UK inside then half the population must be outside it.

There are not many people in the South West and in particular Cornwall. There are not many people north of Aberdeen. So for the purposes of thinking about those circles the UK is roughly a rectangle running from Aberdeen to the South Coast of England, containing 60 million people with roughly even population density except for the fact that there are 10 million people in London. So if you start from somewhere like Dundee (which is about the same distance from Aberdeen as London is from the South Coast) then I think the two circles are going to nudge up against each other pretty closely.

And I think there are therefore only four circles.

One for London and places close to London. One for places north of the midway point between London and Aberdeen. One for places that are close to but south of that point. One for places to the west of the UK, like Cornwall or Northern Ireland.
alithea: Artwork of Francine from Strangers in Paradise, top half only with hair and scarf blowing in the wind (Default)

Re: 50% of the population

[personal profile] alithea 2018-01-29 02:11 pm (UTC)(link)
That certainly sounds plausible.
danieldwilliam: (Default)

Re: 50% of the population

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-01-29 02:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Plausible is the 21st century version of proof.