andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2017-10-03 12:00 pm

Interesting Links for 03-10-2017

danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2017-10-03 11:27 am (UTC)(link)
If Ireland were unified could we assume that the DUP would constitute an indepedence from Dublin movement?
Edited 2017-10-03 12:53 (UTC)
calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2017-10-03 03:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Of course. That's how the polity of Northern Ireland came into being in the first place; when Home Rule was proposed for the island, the ancestors of the DUP objected.
danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2017-10-03 03:32 pm (UTC)(link)
In which case the map has a peculiar circular reference error as Northern Ireland constantly shifts from being part of the UK to being part of the Republic and back and ends up existing in some sort of super-position being both fully British and fully Irish and neither British nor Irish.

I wonder if anyone will notice?
calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2017-10-03 04:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, well, the map. I see the map's premise as being the enactment of all changes currently being pressed for. There's a movement to put N.I. into the Republic. (In the States one sees occasional cryptic bumper stickers reading "26 + 6 = 1" - do you ever get those?) But there isn't currently one to take it out, because it's currently not in. What would happen if the map's changes were enacted is not the map's concern, because the map is a hypothetical construct, not an actual proposal.
danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2017-10-04 08:32 am (UTC)(link)
I think the various Ulster unionists have some reservations about Articles 2 and 3 of the Irish constitution.
danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2017-10-04 08:52 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I think so.

The 1999 Good Friday Agreement related change to the Irish constitution shifted the language to a desire for a unified Ireland, if everyone wanted it, through democratic and peaceful means but there is still a desire for a unified Ireland and an extension of Irish citizenship to anyone born in the island of Ireland.

I think there a number of Ulster unionists (not necessarily the DUP or the Ulster Unionists) who are would prefer that the Irish Constitution said "Ireland is the 26 counties in Ireland and Ireland has no interest or claim on the 6 counties of Northern Ireland which are British."

I'm not suggesting that vey many people are very excited about the current Article 2 and 3 language but there will be some.
calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2017-10-04 01:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, but that's not a desire to change the lines currently on the ground, which is what the map is about.
naath: (Default)

[personal profile] naath 2017-10-04 08:40 am (UTC)(link)
Nice map; and we could all be under the umbrella of the EU...

Does the US have part-ofstates that want to be their own states?
calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2017-10-04 02:09 pm (UTC)(link)
"Does the US have part-ofstates that want to be their own states?"

A good question. Not currently, as far as I recall. There have been in the past suggestions that New York City should secede from New York State, most of which it has nothing in common with, but I haven't heard anything about that in a long time. Nor have other regional grumbles within states taken separatist form as far as I know.

However, a few existing states were formed by cutting up previous states, most notably West Virginia which was the loyalist part of Virginia during the US Civil War; and there's even more if you go back to territorial or colonial days. (Where European boundaries are mostly the relics of tribal settlement or conquest, most US boundaries were drawn by government bureaucrats, first in London then Washington, long before any white settlers were on the ground in those spots, and often using inadequate maps, which is why the boundaries are so peculiar.)

What there has been a lot of in the US in recent decades is county secession movements within states, some of which have come to votes. A few of them have succeeded.

[personal profile] nojay 2017-10-04 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I recall seeing stuff in the US blogosphere about the State of Jefferson, an independence movement to take the right-wiing bits out of California and form their own rural poor federally-subsidised third-world dirt-road state and give the Republican Party two extra senators in Washington.
calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2017-10-04 09:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes. That slipped my mind, but it was current a long time ago, late 1930s. It was pretty much knocked out of people's heads by the Pearl Harbor attack.

It wasn't a right-wing rebellion - California was far from a left-wing mecca in those days, so there wasn't much for right-wingers to protest against state government for - but a rural protest movement intended more for publicity than as a serious secession attempt. It was the far northern tier of California, plus parts of southern Oregon. It's still remembered, perhaps mostly by right-wing types, but the National Public Radio local network in the area still calls itself Jefferson Public Radio, and they're not right-wingers at all.

It's less known, but the California legislature did actually pass an act in the late 1850s to split the state in two (the line would have gone between Fresno and Bakersfield). It was never acted on by Congress, which would have been the next step in the process, and was probably set aside because of some ugly slavery-related overtones to the business, but that's a story of its own.
skington: (fail)

[personal profile] skington 2017-10-03 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Buried at the bottom of the "this is how much we're spending on oil subsidies" article is the revelation that cutting the subsidies would only affect 1% of all the CO2 we can or cannot afford to chuck into the atmosphere - i.e. basically nothing at all.