Doug ([identity profile] drdoug.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] andrewducker 2012-04-12 08:14 pm (UTC)

I guess we'd have to know how many people were found "fit for work" to know if this was an unusually high number anyway.

... and from TFA, it seems this is 1,000 people put in the 'Work-Related Activity' category, which is not the same as 'fit for work'. Admittedly the Mail has previous in conflating these two.

Man sentenced to 6 years in Jail for $1.3 million fraud

That was exactly what I thought! It did work to make me look though, in a way this alternative headline wouldn't have. :-)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting