andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2012-03-07 11:00 am

Interesting Links for 07-03-2012

[identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com 2012-03-07 06:56 pm (UTC)(link)
I think I know what you're saying, but it seems to me there's some things you'd usually want (eg. "acting in an an ethical and professional manner, even at events only tangently related to your employment") and some things that are usually offensive and unethical to ask for (eg. "a permanent tap on your home phone with no accountability over who listens to it").

And it seems like, to me, getting a social networking password is like the phone tap, not like acting professional. But I think many people assume it is a little thing that doesn't matter much. So to be persuaded I don't need fifty-seven million arguments why "assuming it's a little thing that's obviously helpful and doesn't matter, isn't it fair to require it", I need an argument why it's a little thing, rather than a circumvension of anti-wiretapping laws...?

[identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com 2012-03-07 09:42 pm (UTC)(link)
At the end of the day if I was giving someone $100,000 in free money while knowing that if they fucked up I could lose $20 million in money if they did something stupid I'd want to tap their phones, read their facebooks, give them bodyguards who could report back to me, etc...

I don't think that the phone tap or the facebook passwords are little things. I do, however, think, that universities have the right to protect themselves and if you give a giant amount of money to someone they can sign away their general rights - if they want to - in exchange for the cash.

Obviously they should understand this before they take the $100k - but if you take a hundred thousand dollars in exchange for letting your facebook be monitored I think you've made a good deal.

Fuck it, if someone wanted to pay me $100k to monitor my facebook for four years I'd take the money.