Interesting Links for 07-03-2012

[andrewducker]

• Ken Clarke defends secret courts. I, of course, think they're an awful idea.
  (tags: law secrecy security_theatre uk )
• 6 Things Rich People Need to Stop Saying
  (tags: money income society )
• Jews in Scotland may be disenfranchised by a Saturday vote.
  Is there a reason why voting has to happen on one day? Give people a week to vote, with daily updates on the ongoing count!
  (tags: voting uk scotland independence jews )
• Kids born later in the year more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD
  (tags: adhd diagnosis children )
• Govt. agencies, colleges demand applicants' Facebook passwords. (And they can, frankly, fuck off)
  (tags: facebook privacy employment usa )
• Dammit, I find myself largely in agreement with esr on Hollywood, piracy and the internet
  (tags: censorship politics freedom )
• A man who informed police when he found child abuse images on his computer has not been allowed to be alone with his daughter for four months.
  (tags: uk Child_abuse )
• How I became Amazon’s pitchman for a 55-gallon drum of personal lubricant on Facebook
  (tags: lubricant facebook amazon advertising )
• On Writers Block
  (tags: neilgaiman writing )
• I hadn't realised that Gillian Anderson stood on a box for The X-Files
  (tags: GillianAnderson x-files tv )
• Either be offensive, or don't be offensive. Being offensive and then pretending you weren't is just dumb.
  (tags: humour offensive )
• Rather than a mansion tax we should be sorting out council tax
  (tags: tax uk housing )
• Romney vs Mr Burns - can you tell which quote belongs to which one?
  (tags: simpsons politics usa )

Comments

Re: Jews in Scotland may be disenfranchised by a Saturday vote.

[cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com]

Yeah. If all religions commandments which I thought were silly just went away, the world would be an awful lot simpler, but I don't think that's a realistic practical option :)

I am a bit torn. I think people refusing to vote would be taking it a bit far, and I hope this particular case will be solved fairly easily. But also, because so many religious prohibitions seem weird to me, including ones that I find out later are comparatively sensible, I'm very reluctant to decide for myself which ones are "allowed", and there are other similar cases where something is forbidden and and seems silly to me, but people really would fight and die for it, when hoping the problem will just go away won't really work.

Re: Jews in Scotland may be disenfranchised by a Saturday vote.

[andrewducker]

I think it depends on the difficulty and offensiveness of working around it.

If some people cannot vote if it means talking to a woman who is not clothed "modestly" then that seems a step too far to me, and I'd be saying "Feel free to hang around the polling station and hope that a man happens to be on duty soon to help you.

But making sure that we don't hold the poll entirely at a time when some people are forbidden from attendance? Seems doable.

Re: Jews in Scotland may be disenfranchised by a Saturday vote.

[cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com]

Yeah, I think it's a (2d?) continuum between "letting people make up all sorts of commandments on the spot in order to manipulate and disadvantage other people" and "respecting things that are completely core in someone's identity". If someone can only vote between 5:15 and 5:17 on the first Tuesday of March, then they probably have to accept they can't vote. If someone can only vote if the voting hours are extended to 10pm, for one particularly important referendum, hopefully that can be worked round.

Re: Jews in Scotland may be disenfranchised by a Saturday vote.

[del-c.livejournal.com]

It would be simplicity itself to require everyone present at an important civic event to dress modestly, and not more disruptive than to require all voters to vote on a work day. Just a small polite consideration to your fellow voters who happen to be religious, in order not to disenfranchise them. It does sound to me like your willingness to respect the religious depends on the religion.

How much respect did you have for Sunday trading restrictions? (yes, I know Christian law is an arbitrary and inconsistent set of rules, observant Christians seem to observe just the ones they feel like, and many nominal Christians don't seem to observe any of them. Thank goodness other religions aren't like that!)

Re: Jews in Scotland may be disenfranchised by a Saturday vote.

[andrewducker]

The range of "modestly" varies dramatically between cultures. Some people consider women in trousers to be immodest, for instance, and that's a step too far for me.

And I think that society has no business telling individuals when they should open their shops when it comes to religious reasons.

[spacelem.livejournal.com]

Why are they forbidden from attendance? They can't work, but voting isn't work (unless I'm missing something).

Okay, counting votes is work, but the thing about the postal vote and not letting others work seems rather difficult to justify to me, as the person who'll be doing the work hasn't signed up to the "no work" clause (or else they wouldn't be working!).

[andrewducker]

They can't do anything which counts as work or causes other people to work.

As "turning on a light switch" counts as work, voting may well do, you'd have to ask a Rabbi. Probably several.

[spacelem.livejournal.com]

Wow, that's... pretty restrictive O_o

I suspect if turning a light switch counts as work, their religious text might possibly need updating somewhat.

[andrewducker]

One does not update the word of God.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_on_Shabbat_in_Jewish_law

also

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activities_prohibited_on_Shabbat

[spacelem.livejournal.com]

I just did a quick google search on what you can and can't do on a Saturday. Apparently you can flush the toilet (you must in fact, because hygiene trumps work), but you can't tear anything (such as the toilet paper), so an orthodox Jew must tear the toilet paper in advance.

I remain content being not religious.

[andrewducker]

Me too. Very much so.