andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2012-03-07 11:00 am

Interesting Links for 07-03-2012

ext_16733: (Default)

[identity profile] akicif.livejournal.com 2012-03-07 12:54 pm (UTC)(link)
You'd have to be very careful to ensure that information on the count so far didn't get released - I think it's only been in comparativelty recent years that even exit poll results have been published while the polls were still open.

But the whole "disenfranchising people by holding the vote on a day when they can't get to the poll" thing is a complete and utter straw man: it's possible to vote by post.
ext_16733: (Default)

[identity profile] akicif.livejournal.com 2012-03-07 01:06 pm (UTC)(link)
That would mean that you would need tellers (paid) and scutineers (unpaid) for a week rather than just a day. I'm also fairly sure that publicising how a poll is going has got more drawbacks than advantages (numbers at each individual polling station can be low enough that split over a week you've a reasonable chance of being able to tell how a particular group of individuals voted, so you can re-invent the market in buying and selling votes: which is a seriously bad thing).

[identity profile] errolwi.livejournal.com 2012-03-07 06:35 pm (UTC)(link)
It's a total straw man, especially given that laws can be changed. You would think that there is nowhere civilised, with a similar country size, using a very similar electoral system, that votes on Saturday, whose law and experience could be referred to.
More than 10% of the votes in the recent NZ election were Advance Votes. Most of those were from people walking into one of the polling stations that were available for the two weeks before polling day. IT'S NOT DIFFICULT!