andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2012-02-23 11:00 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
- 4g,
- academia,
- acta,
- ai,
- amazon,
- awesome,
- censorship,
- conservatives,
- copyright,
- economics,
- europe,
- internet,
- iphone,
- lcd,
- lgbt,
- links,
- mathematics,
- media,
- mobile_phones,
- monitors,
- northernireland,
- orange,
- politics,
- pricing,
- research,
- science,
- sleep,
- t-mobile,
- teaching,
- technology,
- transgender,
- uk
Interesting Links for 23-02-2012
- Science Finds a Better Way to Teach Science. (Lectures are pointless. I wish I was even slightly surprised)
- The British idea that ordinary people don't need to understand mathematics causes appalling problems
- How the European Internet Rose Up Against ACTA. (Gives me a warm feeling inside.)
- The myth of the eight-hour sleep - humans may be adapted for two 4-hour naps, with a 2-hour gap in the middle
- What NOT to do when relaunching the Conservatives in Northern Ireland
- A week of picking on trans people
- The Only 4 Monitors You Should Buy
- The iPhone umbilical cord charger. If I had an iPhone, I'd have one.
- How Bots Seized Control of My Pricing Strategy
- Orange, T-Mobile ready to launch 4G together in UK this year
no subject
Students have an opportunity to privately discuss with me at the end as well.
However, for the top-end students, missing the lecture and reading the notes might well be 90% as good. That said, I've regularly encountered high-flying students who miss out on learning because they are good enough to get through without reading lecture notes and sometimes have missing techniques in their armoury -- so I've occasionally taught students who were better coders than I am and sometimes regretted that they felt there was little they could learn by going at the pace of the majority.
I'm perfectly happy for students to skip the lecture and read the notes but unfortunately my institution is not and attendance is compulsory and checked with a register -- I wish it weren't.
no subject
no subject
In general I think a good coder only needs to know "this is the efficient algorithm" to code it not really to understand fully how the proof of the order of execution time follows.
no subject
no subject
no subject