andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2012-02-23 11:00 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
- 4g,
- academia,
- acta,
- ai,
- amazon,
- awesome,
- censorship,
- conservatives,
- copyright,
- economics,
- europe,
- internet,
- iphone,
- lcd,
- lgbt,
- links,
- mathematics,
- media,
- mobile_phones,
- monitors,
- northernireland,
- orange,
- politics,
- pricing,
- research,
- science,
- sleep,
- t-mobile,
- teaching,
- technology,
- transgender,
- uk
Interesting Links for 23-02-2012
- Science Finds a Better Way to Teach Science. (Lectures are pointless. I wish I was even slightly surprised)
- The British idea that ordinary people don't need to understand mathematics causes appalling problems
- How the European Internet Rose Up Against ACTA. (Gives me a warm feeling inside.)
- The myth of the eight-hour sleep - humans may be adapted for two 4-hour naps, with a 2-hour gap in the middle
- What NOT to do when relaunching the Conservatives in Northern Ireland
- A week of picking on trans people
- The Only 4 Monitors You Should Buy
- The iPhone umbilical cord charger. If I had an iPhone, I'd have one.
- How Bots Seized Control of My Pricing Strategy
- Orange, T-Mobile ready to launch 4G together in UK this year
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Hmm... you over state the case here but it is not news that lectures are not the most effective way to get the point across. Unfortunately most of the more effective methods are very staff intensive. Given one person and a set amount of material to be got through, a standard lecture may be pretty much your only realistic choice.
All lecturers (pretty much) know that testing students on material, engaging with them and getting them to attempt to answer stuff as you go on helps... of course this all takes time and relies on the students actually participating (e.g. avoiding the "Anyone, anyone, Bueller?" sort of call for participation).
Ellefson ran a study in which a group of students were briefly pushed every day to revisit earlier material, while another group just plowed ahead with the new material.
Which is why a standard lecture course in the sciences also comes with worksheet questions, tutorials and so on.
There's also the question of "to whom are you teaching" -- if you take some of those methods, going back, revisiting material, recapping and so on, it really does help the bottom end but it loses the top end... that is, the less able students get a better deal the more able students a worse deal.
Teaching coding was an eyeopener for me as I interacted with the students regularly in the classroom so could see where they had and where they had not understood what was said.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
That bot pricing thing was awesome. It's like we're living in a scifi novel ... about living in a scifi novel.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
DEATH TO THE DEMONESS ALLEGRA GELLER
no subject
30 mins: waiting for professor to turn up
60 mins: listening to professor bitch about university politics
10 mins: general banter
20 mins: actual lecture
And yet I wouldn't have missed those lectures for anything.
What lectures teach you that books and notes don't is culture and style. I'm sure the formal content of Prof Brown's lectures on Bremsstrahlung radiation or modelling SS433 could have been delivered on paper, but the style of approaching problems in a particular way, the scientific and intellectual culture that forms the foundation of a way of approaching hard problems - these things are learned much better in person. And learning the astrophysical problem-solving style of the Astronomer Royal is more than worth the investment of time.
I'm not particularly wedded to the lecture per se, but I think that learning is about much more than just the transmission of information, and that contact time between students and senior researchers is incredibly valuable even if it seems terribly inefficient.
(no subject)
(no subject)