andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2011-09-07 11:14 am

You can rent them by the yard

Just to be entirely clear, we're talking about _ebooks_ here.

[Poll #1776583]

[identity profile] bohemiancoast.livejournal.com 2011-09-07 11:12 am (UTC)(link)
This is a library and state provision is the way to go. I don't read so many books that I can't afford to buy all the etexts I want.

[identity profile] alextfish.livejournal.com 2011-09-07 12:14 pm (UTC)(link)
How curious! Why do the library impose limits like that on something electronic?

[identity profile] ninebelow.livejournal.com 2011-09-07 12:39 pm (UTC)(link)
I imagine it is imposed on them. With physical books, there is a monetary outlay that places a limit on how many copies they can issue. This would have to be artificially imposed for e-books and the reason someone (the PLR?) would want to impose this is to protect income for authors.

[identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com 2011-09-07 01:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I can confirm that this is the case.

[identity profile] steer.livejournal.com 2011-09-07 02:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes... it is a licencing issue. We have similar things with some bits of software -- the licence allows only (say) 25 simultaneous copies running on the central system. If you pay more you can have more simultaneous copies.

[identity profile] ajr.livejournal.com 2011-09-07 07:41 pm (UTC)(link)
The limits are imposed on the library by the publishers.
cyprinella: broken neon sign that reads "lies & fish" (Default)

[personal profile] cyprinella 2011-09-07 07:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Publishers want to set library ebooks to expire after being lent something like 26 times, forcing another purchase of the book. Harper Collins started it: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/jacketcopy/2011/03/harpercollins-library-ebook-checkout-limit.html