simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)

[personal profile] simont 2011-07-20 02:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I wonder on what grounds the rest of the countries in the world are excluded from this graph. Perhaps because these are the countries in which the "do you believe in evolution" survey has happened? But it doesn't say that, which leaves me with just the sneaking suspicion that the graph might turn out to look a lot more haphazard with a full set of data, and that the data points shown might have been cherry-picked to give a misleading impression.
ext_51145: (Default)

[identity profile] andrewhickey.info 2011-07-20 04:37 pm (UTC)(link)
The summary on Science's website of the original paper (all that's accessible without payment) says "The acceptance of evolution is lower in the United States than in Japan or Europe, largely because of widespread fundamentalism and the politicization of science in the United States." (That's the whole summary).

I'm pretty sure that means that any cherry-picking has gone on, if at all, in the original article. (The big ones I'd be interested in are Canada, Australia and New Zealand)

[identity profile] gonzo21.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 02:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Good grief, only 40% of the American public believe in evolution?!!

[identity profile] gonzo21.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 03:04 pm (UTC)(link)
So much for my hope that it was still a minority.

[identity profile] fjm.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 03:07 pm (UTC)(link)
At least someone who said "yes they should" won.

[identity profile] gonzo21.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 03:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Probably took quite a lot of guts to stand up and say that in that environment.

[identity profile] fjm.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 02:58 pm (UTC)(link)
I read once, and I can't remember where, that there is a direct correlation between declining belief in heaven, and the presence of retirement benefits.

[identity profile] fjm.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 02:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Just a thought: but if you did this state by state for the USA I wonder if it would show the same curve?

[identity profile] fjm.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 03:11 pm (UTC)(link)
New York!!! That is so sad.

[identity profile] eatsoylentgreen.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 03:43 pm (UTC)(link)
it's city versus suburban/rural, red districts vs blue

um that means tory versus um... not tory... commie?

[identity profile] eatsoylentgreen.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 03:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Turkey is an outlier too, the line should go through Bulgaria instead.

[identity profile] channelpenguin.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 03:47 pm (UTC)(link)
i thought that

[identity profile] chipuni.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 04:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know why they chose the formula they did ( y = A(1-B/x) ), unless they really wanted to keep Turkey in the graph.

A straight line would have been easier...

[identity profile] eatsoylentgreen.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 04:11 pm (UTC)(link)
or, you know, a big oval, which is what it is.

[identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Yup. Discard Turkey *and* the USA as outliers and you've got a straight line with a fair-but-explainable bit of noise.

[identity profile] eatsoylentgreen.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 07:07 pm (UTC)(link)
a line implies movement though, and I think such an implication is incorrect. There's nothing making countries more rich and scientific.

[identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 07:11 pm (UTC)(link)
True. Might as well have no line at all, and simply point out that more science correlates with more money in all but one case - and that one case is 0.1% of it's population away from being somwhere to the left of Turkey.
Edited 2011-07-20 19:11 (UTC)

[identity profile] eatsoylentgreen.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 07:35 pm (UTC)(link)
yes we are definitely exceptional in many wonderful and horrible ways

[identity profile] bohemiancoast.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 04:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I wonder how an analysis by income *parity* would come out? The US has a lot of very poor people you know, and rather fewer very rich ones.

[identity profile] undeadbydawn.livejournal.com 2011-07-21 03:11 pm (UTC)(link)
not to mention that the mega-rich tend to be religious right. Or claim to be, anyway.

given that 80% of US money is in the top few % of people, that's a massive factor

[identity profile] eatsoylentgreen.livejournal.com 2011-07-21 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)
they just worship themselves

[identity profile] apostle-of-eris.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 05:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Austria? Switzerland?

[identity profile] johnbobshaun.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 06:28 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd be interested to know the figures for India and China since they're glaring omissions from the sample.

[identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 06:49 pm (UTC)(link)
With the exception of Japan and the USA, the data points are all for Europe and Europe-adjacent countries.

(Canada also would buck the line, I suspect. We've got tons of ignorant people *and* a decent GDP.)

[identity profile] momentsmusicaux.livejournal.com 2011-07-21 12:01 pm (UTC)(link)
as are the rest of 'The Americas'...

[identity profile] heron61.livejournal.com 2011-07-20 08:26 pm (UTC)(link)
It's even sadder if you live here. This is a nation where I consider around 20-25% of the population to be dangerously delusional (IOW religious extremism and religious bigotry are central to their worldview, and they also tend to believe oddities like the US president is a Muslim who was born in Kenya). I rather suspect those numbers are considerably lower in other developed nations.

[identity profile] lpetrazickis.livejournal.com 2011-07-21 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
As someone born in Latvia, I have to say :-(