My theory, by the way, was that by anticipating debate, and highlighting that to people, it would then fail to occur, because people would get their impulse to respond satisfied by clicking "Yes".
Even though we've only just started the 210th decade of the Anno Domini, we've definitely been out of the noughties since 2010 reared its ugly head. Otherwise surely 2000 was in the 90s, which is silly as the word 90s implies there's a 9 in the title.
I mean, when you hit 30 you're in your 30s...you're certainly not in your 20s.
I remember a link some while back saying the same thing that swung my vote. You can start a decade whenever you like. Just because the first decade began with the year 1, doesn't mean you have to start counting all future decades from that. A decade is just a serial grouping of 10 years.
The 201st decade, not the 210th decade, which will be 2091-2100. But yes, the period from 2000 to 2009 was a decade, although it wasn't the 201st decade.
Aye, we make this time up, so we can largely decide what we want. These days, for years, I tend to count by significant digit, so when we went from 2009 into 2010, new decade right there. No-one ever tried to claim 1990 was in the 80s...
We don't need a term for that decade now, because we can just say 'the last decade'. It's ten or twenty years from now, when people looking back over recent history want to talk about the trends that happened in that decade as opposed to the ones in the surrounding decades, that they'll start needing a less relative name for it.
(Which doesn't contradict your point, of course, that we can ignore the question for now and let people worry about it as and when it actually becomes a problem for them.)
My first day back was today. But I know people that worked New Years Day, and I've worked Xmas day once or twice.
Admittedly that was 'go into office, check messages, reply to emails from SE Asian agents, go home', and normally took less'n an hour, but it had to be done.
And given my generally humbugish approach to Xmas, worked well for me.
Then, when in the US over Xmas, I spent Xmas day in a multiplex, which is apparently a tradition over there, lots of service sector types working.
I've worked New Year before - doing directory enquiries. Which was terribly entertaining, as just after midnight you get a whole bunch of calls along the lines of "We haven't seen Uncle Trevor in thirty years. He lived in Norfolk. Can you find me his number?"
While I worked on the 29th (for about 5 hours, and in the office even), I'm only scheduled to work in January on the 10th, 17th and 24th (31st is a Public Holiday).
Hmmm, let's see. Two grandmothers died, my father died (the entire circumstances surrounding that event have been extremely stressful), and we had a miscarriage. Also I spent the entire year working on a paper that still isn't finished.
no subject
Of course, this comment probably negates that :->
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
WRONG WRONG WRONG Americans.
> Now that they're over, the previous decade will be referred to as...
You forgot to ask people whether they think the decade ended last Saturday or last year...
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
WRONG WRONG WRONG Americans.
First reaction: why so emphatic?
Second reaction: if he gets that worked up over something that trivial, I probably don't want to know.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I mean, when you hit 30 you're in your 30s...you're certainly not in your 20s.
I remember a link some while back saying the same thing that swung my vote. You can start a decade whenever you like. Just because the first decade began with the year 1, doesn't mean you have to start counting all future decades from that. A decade is just a serial grouping of 10 years.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Which doesn't contradict your point, of course, that we can ignore the question for now and let people worry about it as and when it actually becomes a problem for them.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Admittedly that was 'go into office, check messages, reply to emails from SE Asian agents, go home', and normally took less'n an hour, but it had to be done.
And given my generally humbugish approach to Xmas, worked well for me.
Then, when in the US over Xmas, I spent Xmas day in a multiplex, which is apparently a tradition over there, lots of service sector types working.
no subject
no subject
no subject
A.x
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
*puts on hard hat*
Distant future
no subject
Wait you don't do our yankee grades. Fuck.
It was barely passing. Do I consider myself lucky to be alive, in a life that I no longer want?
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Yes, 2010 was a seriously bad year for me.
no subject
(no subject)