Well, I suspect the basic idea will remain as laughably stupid as before, unless they retcon it away as "the human's believed that X was happening, but actually it was Y."
I always liked Neil Gaiman's explanation that human creativity was better than the AI's and therefore they were kept around to come up with wacky ideas for the machines to make use of.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
andrewducker) wrote2003-04-09 02:15 pm
no subject
Hope they get a plot this time (hopefully one that isn't as laughably stupid as the first one).
no subject
I always liked Neil Gaiman's explanation that human creativity was better than the AI's and therefore they were kept around to come up with wacky ideas for the machines to make use of.