Rephrase: could be simulated by computer in theory, possibly, given a powerful enough computer, the likes of which we're not yet capable of building. Which may mean my real vote should be for the first option.
(I'm firmly in the "Do I believe science can explain everything? Yes. So I believe we know all there is to know about science? No." camp)
Yes, I was assuming this. I don't understand when people forget progress happens. Or indeed supposed scientists who operate on "if it's not proven true it must be false", rather than just not known yet.
no subject
(I'm firmly in the "Do I believe science can explain everything? Yes. So I believe we know all there is to know about science? No." camp)
no subject