I don't want us to talk past each other, but I'm having trouble fitting the first and second portion of your argument together.
Would it be fair to say I'm talking about rape as it's represented publically, and you're talking more about internal experiences? I absolutely have no problem with different people reacting to an event in different ways - we all have different reactions to violence, grief, loss, etc. My reaction to the spitting was trivial, but another person might have been deeply psychologically affected.
But, while this is just a one-off story, if every man and woman who lied to their partner was now defined as a rapist, I'd have a hard time taking stories of rape seriously. That is, I'd have a hard time knowing that, say, increasing sexual assault statistics included a woman saying 'I'll still love you in the morning' or a man saying 'I'm 28' when he's 30. And while I might have every sympathy for an individual and their personal experience however they define it, I'd become somewhat more cynical or distrustful overall. If the boundaries of 'assault' include harsh language or when 'racial hatred' includes Andy telling me a joke about the Irish, I get pretty cynical.
I know what you mean about slippery slope arguments, but for me some terms are only so elastic, and then snap.
Don't forget, we're also talking about a situation that's not in our country, and while I'm in no way supporting or ignoring the very strong racila element in this one story, if there is precedent that lying=rape, then there's precedent.
If it helps to clarify my opinion on this one case:
- Because laws are country-specific, the legality of any one action depends on where it takes place.
- Lying to get sex is immoral.
- Rape is sex without the consent of any or all of the parties involved. If that consent is conditional on a lie, than the definition gets blurry. Personally, I think it depends on the lie.
- "He told me he was Jewish!" is a racist argument and one that I find abhorent. I am not, however, a citzen of Israel.
- regardless of your personal opinion of whether act 'X' is rape or not, the attitude "calling it rape is offensive to real victims of rape!" will make me headdesk.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
andrewducker) wrote2010-07-22 12:00 pm
no subject
Would it be fair to say I'm talking about rape as it's represented publically, and you're talking more about internal experiences? I absolutely have no problem with different people reacting to an event in different ways - we all have different reactions to violence, grief, loss, etc. My reaction to the spitting was trivial, but another person might have been deeply psychologically affected.
But, while this is just a one-off story, if every man and woman who lied to their partner was now defined as a rapist, I'd have a hard time taking stories of rape seriously. That is, I'd have a hard time knowing that, say, increasing sexual assault statistics included a woman saying 'I'll still love you in the morning' or a man saying 'I'm 28' when he's 30. And while I might have every sympathy for an individual and their personal experience however they define it, I'd become somewhat more cynical or distrustful overall. If the boundaries of 'assault' include harsh language or when 'racial hatred' includes Andy telling me a joke about the Irish, I get pretty cynical.
I know what you mean about slippery slope arguments, but for me some terms are only so elastic, and then snap.
no subject
Don't forget, we're also talking about a situation that's not in our country, and while I'm in no way supporting or ignoring the very strong racila element in this one story, if there is precedent that lying=rape, then there's precedent.
If it helps to clarify my opinion on this one case:
- Because laws are country-specific, the legality of any one action depends on where it takes place.
- Lying to get sex is immoral.
- Rape is sex without the consent of any or all of the parties involved. If that consent is conditional on a lie, than the definition gets blurry. Personally, I think it depends on the lie.
- "He told me he was Jewish!" is a racist argument and one that I find abhorent. I am not, however, a citzen of Israel.
- regardless of your personal opinion of whether act 'X' is rape or not, the attitude "calling it rape is offensive to real victims of rape!" will make me headdesk.
Um, does that help?
no subject
I'd not really thought about how consent (part of the definition of rape) isn't a simple binary, and should actually be _informed consent_.
no subject