[identity profile] usmu.livejournal.com 2010-05-04 02:37 pm (UTC)(link)
He might, but that still doesn't excuse his joke. He's right in calling attention to the problem, but the way he does is wrong. If being Jewish was the sole part of it, he would be right. It's not so it's racial stereotyping, which makes him wrong.

I can't understand why Jeff Dunham is so hugely popular for the same reason. His material consists mostly of racial stereotyping and is rather offensive because of it.

[identity profile] usmu.livejournal.com 2010-05-06 10:10 am (UTC)(link)
I don't have a problem with his views on this problem. I do have a problem with his jokes. His explanation comes after the fact. Based solely on the jokes, which I don't find funny to begin with, he implies that the only thing the Israeli army does is kick woman in the back and that the Jews are responsible for the situation in Palestine.

Fact is, it's not a Jew - Palestinian problem, it's a Israeli - Palestine problem. If you constitute race into something where it doesn't belong, and I don't think it does in this particular case, you're doing it wrong.

Not only that, it's a rather one-sided view of the problem. He seems to forget that both the PLO and Hamas aren't really friendly people either.

[identity profile] usmu.livejournal.com 2010-05-06 10:29 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, Israel is founded on race, but ut not all people of the particular race live in that country. You don't speak for all Jews if you speak for all Israelis. Nor are all Israelis Jewish.

Nor is race the only cause of the problems. The Jewish religion, which is tightly bound with race, is part of the problem facing the state of Israel. Just as much as it's Islamic and Christian problem because of the holy sites in Jerusalem.

Franky made a joke about Jews. He should have made a joke about Israelis. Just as in the first case. Wouldn't have made it funny, but at least it would have made it less bad.

[identity profile] usmu.livejournal.com 2010-05-06 10:56 am (UTC)(link)
And this is different how? If you reference the fact that they're Jewish, you obviously think it's relevant. Why do it otherwise? He doesn't do it in the first joke, so why in the second one?

[identity profile] usmu.livejournal.com 2010-05-06 12:07 pm (UTC)(link)
I guess we're not going to see eye to eye on this one, because I fail to see how either race or religion is relevant to the joke that was made.

Even if it's factually correct and does play a part in the general problem.

[identity profile] usmu.livejournal.com 2010-05-06 01:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Call it a day?

Only if it's actually a day and relevant to the issue at hand. ;)