a more serious poll

[identity profile] remush.livejournal.com 2010-04-14 09:06 am (UTC)(link)
see http://www.freewebs.com/international-languages/
results at http://multivote.sparklit.com/poll.spark/3142


3072 voted on " Which language should be the world's official common language? "

Results today (2010-04-14)
324 English
1964 Esperanto

247 "newly developed language"

Klingon should be mentioned here a few times
(adding your 43 votes here won't change much)

Re: a more serious poll

[identity profile] remush.livejournal.com 2010-04-14 09:32 am (UTC)(link)
Sorry,
Klingon should be mentioned under
"Other existing constructed language" (100 voters)

Re: a more serious poll

[identity profile] remush.livejournal.com 2010-04-14 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks for your honesty.
"[...]happen slowly [...]"
You are right... much too slowly.
"[...] sprout dialects"
This is assuming that a language like Esperanto will evolve like natural languages did: thanks to illiterates. Analyze how Esperanto evolved during the last century, and you will notice it does follow another pattern.

A common language (as Esperanto) would be a blessing for humanity (well...assuming the values Esperantists are cherishing are taken with the language.)





Re: a more serious poll

[identity profile] remush.livejournal.com 2010-04-15 07:04 am (UTC)(link)
"switch to speaking Esperanto rather silly"

As silly as switching to the Euro, or more?

"Something like Globish"
or like Basic English, or Kitchen French or Vulgar Latin?

Why would a complete language not suit you as worldwide second language?
What is missing is the political will.

However, something like Mandarin Chinese is even more likely. The disadvantage is that you must start learning now, or your grand children will be left behind.