andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2010-02-03 08:24 am

Leaping Tiger


[Poll #1520617]

(if you can't see the picture then let me know)

Re: Leaping Tiger

[identity profile] wolfieboy.livejournal.com 2010-02-03 08:37 am (UTC)(link)
I can see it if I go into the entry. Easier if you include width & height tags though. :)

Re: Leaping Tiger

[identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com 2010-02-03 10:14 am (UTC)(link)
Well, I don't know about it making it more likely to display, but I always include width and height tags to be considerate because trying to scroll up and down a page with loading images on it is a damn sight easier if all the right sized spaces are there (having loaded immediately with width/height tags) instead of the scrollbar constantly getting smaller as you scroll while the images load without said tags. I was taught that including w/h tags was only polite; I'm surprised you don't.
Edited 2010-02-03 10:14 (UTC)

Re: Leaping Tiger

[identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com 2010-02-03 11:45 am (UTC)(link)
Ah. Well, like I say, width= and height= are your friends - it means that the html loads the space that image belongs in immediately, and so the scroll bar on your page doesn't change as it loads.

I was self-taught code by the internet too, but John W made that comment about image code when looking at one of my little sites.

Re: Leaping Tiger

[identity profile] holyoutlaw.livejournal.com 2010-02-03 09:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Using Semagic:

Ctrl+M brings up the Make Link/Image dialog box, with the cursor in the Internet Address text box. I delete the text already in there, and paste in the URL of the image.

I never both with the Title or Link Text text boxes.

At the bottom of the dialog box is a control group for Image. I've checked the "Detect image size" check box.

This might be a couple extra keystrokes but it includes the height and width tags.

Re: Leaping Tiger

[identity profile] mooism.livejournal.com 2010-02-03 11:54 am (UTC)(link)
Probably not what [livejournal.com profile] wolfieboy means, but: LJ has a setting to strip images from your friends page if they are too wide. This setting also strips images from your friends page if they don't have a width attribute in the html.

Re: Leaping Tiger

[identity profile] wolfieboy.livejournal.com 2010-02-03 01:32 pm (UTC)(link)
That's exactly what I was talking about. LJ displays a placeholder if the image is over a certain size, for me at 1024x768. If no height/width tags are supplied, LJ doesn't know how big the image is without fetching it and so does the safe thing and just displays the placeholder.

[identity profile] bugshaw.livejournal.com 2010-02-03 11:23 am (UTC)(link)
[x] Seized mid-air by hawk

[identity profile] vereybowring.livejournal.com 2010-02-03 12:57 pm (UTC)(link)
or [x] dragged under and consumed by shark.

Re: hawk

[identity profile] wolfieboy.livejournal.com 2010-02-03 01:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I like you. :)

[identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com 2010-02-03 02:24 pm (UTC)(link)
What do you mean, "made it"?

Hoverkitty is WHIRRRRRing.

[identity profile] rahaeli.livejournal.com 2010-02-03 04:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Well? *g*

[identity profile] dapperscavenger.livejournal.com 2010-02-03 06:54 pm (UTC)(link)
[x] invisible tightrope

[identity profile] luckylove.livejournal.com 2010-02-07 04:17 am (UTC)(link)
Win!