andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2010-02-01 01:23 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Next time someone tells you that Labour and the Conservatives are identical

Notice the trend up throughout the 90s as things got worse and worse, and then the trend down shortly after Labour took office?
They may have done a lot of things wrong, but the NHS is a lot better off than it was.
From
no subject
True from these data but it's not impossible to discern whether patient care has improved. If you look at tables of mortality and morbidity (te latter slightly more dodgy) you see a very cheery graph. It'd be well worth pulling these figures (ONS publish them) and seeing how they compare to the above. Obviously, one can't be sure about what did or didn't cause any change in the mortality rate (or rather, in the rate in which the mortality rate improves, especially compared to other OECD countries) - but it'd be very interesting.
You can massage all figures, but all-cause mortality is one of the harder ones to fudge.
no subject
They also publish a separate set of life tables.
Life expectancy at birth and at age 65 consistently increased over the last few decades, but the increases are larger in 1997/99 - 2006/08 than in 1988/90 - 1997/99, for both men and woman and for both ages. The "extra" improvement is between 25% and 95% over the 1988/90 - 1997/99 baseline.
no subject
Total tangent (always happens to me when I get my head stuck in to these sorts of figures) but I'm interested to note (from an accompanying PDF) that the life expectancy gap between males and females has shrunk from 5.4 years in 1991/93 to 4.2 years in 2006/08 - because male life expectancy improved even more than female.
Hooray for improved life expectancy. It's a good thing to have come to expect.