andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2010-01-06 11:02 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Delicious LiveJournal Links for 1-6-2010
-
Actually, in 672 bytes.
-
The Singularity, as experienced by a non-geek.
-
It (and Dexter) have more people pirating it than watching it live...
no subject
And the 'slow' statement for the faulty-ROM-ed machines - classic! I'd forgotten about that little quirk of the early Zx81s.
I think I might have been a real programmer back then....
no subject
no subject
BTW your apostrophes are failing... is that the incoming data?
no subject
And yes, I blame bad apostrophes in the original RSS.
no subject
no subject
Yours,
Intrigued By Music
=====
Dear Intrigued,
CD players are just pieces of pointless carbon-burning headed for eventual tech landfill. If you wish to listen to a wide variety of different music then I suggest you learn how to play the piano.
Yours,
Dr Musicaux
no subject
B) Thank you. That is just what I did. :p
Seriously, come on. They really are technical gizmowank for the arse of it.
no subject
b) Yes. It is.
No more than CD players are. If you want to listen to a huge range of music very easily then you have a machine that plays music. If you want to carry around (or display) a huge range of pictures very easily then you have a machine that displays pictures. Certainly, not everyone has a need for this, but when my cousin came back from Kenya he carried around a photoframe-like device for a while because it meant he could show people his holiday snaps without either printing off hundreds of pictures of needing to be near a PC. It was very handy. I'm not sure why you object to this.
no subject
no subject
Beep()
Re: Beep()
But why does that matter? Well it turns out that many enterprises (both governments and corporations) have requirements that prevent them from purchasing equipment that lacks accessible technologies and that meant that you couldn’t sell computers that didn’t have beep hardware to those enterprises."
So what he's saying is that the assistive technologies needed sound to go with them - and that the standard method of them doing so was to call "Beep" as you could be assured that all PCs would produce a beeping sound when this happened.
Re: Beep()
What I'm basically saying is this: Beep() is an API. It should be abstract. There is no requirement that it be implemented in any particular way, only that it work.
So for the last 20 years, hardware manufacturers have been manufacturing PCs with something that looks like an 8254 in them, just to make a beeping sound when a Windows program calls Beep(), when it would have been far simpler to change the software implementation of Beep() to use the *real* sound system.
What I am basically saying is this: that is crazy. ;)
Re: Beep()
And nobody ever got around to changing Beep, because it wasn't high priority.
I'm not sure when we transitioned to every motherboard having a sound card built in. 5 years ago? 10?
no subject