andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2003-03-04 09:33 pm

(no subject)

When I showed this to Erin she said it explained why women were much more fun.

[identity profile] weetanya.livejournal.com 2003-03-04 01:38 pm (UTC)(link)
it's brilliant.

[identity profile] cruft.livejournal.com 2003-03-04 02:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Hey, could I beg an lj-cut? I'm only running at 800x600 resolution.

[identity profile] aberbotimue.livejournal.com 2003-03-04 02:58 pm (UTC)(link)
this is why leaving my farther at such a yong age has screwed me up .. Some one to explain some of these dials?

I mean, what do some of them do..
shannon_a: (Default)

[personal profile] shannon_a 2003-03-04 05:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Last time I ran stats on some of my company's web sites, within the last year, something like 45% of users were still at 800x600.

Cute pic.

[identity profile] onceupon.livejournal.com 2003-03-05 12:35 pm (UTC)(link)
*snort*

(Anonymous) 2003-03-06 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Some people don't have good enough eyesight to see things well at higher resolutions.
Would you want to have to squint and lean close to your monitor just to be able to read
small text? Doesn't mean they're in the dark ages.


(Anonymous) 2003-03-07 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, when I got my new LCD monitor, which didn't do low resolutions well at all, I had to
create a custom scheme (which I usually do anyway for colors), and increase all the font
sizes. But that usually doesn't increase the sizes of the icons, etc. And what's so great
about having pictures show up smaller, anyway? (Unless the pic really is larger than one's
screen, which I don't think is the majority of cases). Used to be, bigger was better ::smile::