Conversation versus Doctrine

[andrewducker]

Joe, who I am (from time to time) proud to have as a friend, has written an interesting piece on why he prefers conversations to books.

I don't agree with everything he's written, but it's definitely thought provoking.

Comments

Re: You never said that

[broin.livejournal.com]

Andy: I don't see anything in your piece that says that books don't have the power to indoctrinate.

Books *might* have the power to indoctrinate, sure. Like you say, if they are about general statements, and general statements can brainwash, then sure. But that topic is not an inherent part of my post, nor does it even interest me. :)

I like conversation because I like conversation. Lots of the time, I'm not even trying to win people over, because I recognise the purpose in dissent and individuality.

The fun is often in the argument, rather than the conclusion, too. Books, OTOH, present arguments and conclusions, and there's no way to continue the conversation outside the book.

The inability to continue the conversation is the thrust of my post and behind my dislike of books. Not the possibility that they can indoctrinate.