andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2009-10-05 12:01 pm
Entry tags:

Delicious LiveJournal Links for 10-5-2009

[identity profile] princealbert.livejournal.com 2009-10-05 11:18 am (UTC)(link)
Torness was designed to withstand a 747.

[identity profile] nancylebov.livejournal.com 2009-10-05 12:27 pm (UTC)(link)
The anti-probiotic piece didn't have any details about how the studies were constructed, so there's no way to say whether they were reasonable.

That death of the newspapers graph is just the top chunks, so as to make the change look larger. How to Lie with Statistics is just as relevant as it ever was.

Twins start out with a shared environment in the womb-- it's hard to say how important this is, but it might have some contribution. On the other hand, it wouldn't do much for the hardcore freewill supporters.

Womb environment doesn't affect tameness in foxes.

There is still the possibility that the hormones sloshing around during pregnancy might alter fetal development and hence behaviour. Ruling this out requires switching embryos between mothers, which has yet to be done in rats. It has, however, been done in the silver foxes and had no obvious effect.
Edited 2009-10-05 12:44 (UTC)

[identity profile] odheirre.livejournal.com 2009-10-05 12:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Last Chance to See had Douglas Adams writing about the kakapo -- really cool.

[identity profile] kurosau.livejournal.com 2009-10-05 01:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Those nuclear fuel containers are totally awesome, but they can only take so much heat. There have been tunnel fires in the US that, had one of them been involved, it likely would've melted. I'm guessing that they didn't plan for a runaway superhot tunnel fire or something.

[identity profile] kurosau.livejournal.com 2009-10-05 01:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, also, there's the fact that they avoid tunnels and bridges when using them, but it's still not as failproof as it could be.

[identity profile] sigmonster.livejournal.com 2009-10-05 01:44 pm (UTC)(link)
"Average annual earnings in Edinburgh before tax rose from £22,000 in 2000 to £33,000 in 2008."

Compound interest time! 1.05^8=1.48, so the average annual increase is just a gnat's piss more than 5%. National median full-time wages had annual increases of between 3% and 4.8% over that span, so Edinburgh is interestingly higher than the national average, but not dramatically so. But, come to think of it, those 2000 and 2008 values are very round figures - can we find something more accurate?

Yes, rhetorical questioner, we can! For the City of Edinbugh local authority area, I find 2008 median gross annual earnings of 23,079, mean 28,827 (for everybody working in Edinburgh): and median 22,954, mean 28,247 (for everybody living in Edinburgh). My source is ASHE, tables 7 and 8. Damned if I know what the reporter's source is.

So this one sentence is misleading in that it doesn't show any national or international comparison, which would let us form an idea of whether this is over or underperformance. It's misleading in that it doesn't give the average AR over the period - the annual rate is the form we are all more familar with, and which allows us to readily compare RPI or CPI against wage increases. It doesn't cite any source, so we can't assess for potential bias or find out any methodology. And it disagrees violently with the nearest equivalent National Statistics figures we can find.

Ah, newspapers. How I love them.

Nature versus nurture

[identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com 2009-10-05 04:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Not the best blog post I've ever done that.