It is _extremely_ uncommon for the President to get involved in issues such as this. It is usually left to the upper echelons of the political party to deal with these kinds of things, because they are negative. A president has no problem when it comes to showing face to boot an election but to say who can or cannot run has traditionally been left up to the lackys because is negative and is publicly humiliating to the person they want to remove.
And Obama REEKS of Chicago Politics and has from the very beginning but its is so easy to overlook since he pees wine.
Truth- this call should have NEVER come from Obama. Once again, I wish Paterson had the numbers or could come up from behind to prove a point. I don't live in NY but was working there when the scandle took place that placed him in office. Paterson is a well spoken man so I do wish him well.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
andrewducker) wrote2009-09-26 10:31 am
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif){kind=small}
no subject
It is _extremely_ uncommon for the President to get involved in issues such as this. It is usually left to the upper echelons of the political party to deal with these kinds of things, because they are negative. A president has no problem when it comes to showing face to boot an election but to say who can or cannot run has traditionally been left up to the lackys because is negative and is publicly humiliating to the person they want to remove.
And Obama REEKS of Chicago Politics and has from the very beginning but its is so easy to overlook since he pees wine.
Truth- this call should have NEVER come from Obama. Once again, I wish Paterson had the numbers or could come up from behind to prove a point. I don't live in NY but was working there when the scandle took place that placed him in office. Paterson is a well spoken man so I do wish him well.