andrewducker: (psychodrama)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2009-07-15 10:58 pm

Empathic Failure

One of the strange attitudes on the spoilers post is that of people who seem insistent on telling me how I should enjoy movies.  That I pay too much attention to plot, or that I just shouldn't enjoy a movie less if I know how it's going to turn out.

This seems to be a common thread in discussion on the internet - one person says "I don't like X." and a bunch of people say that not enjoying X is immature, or that it's not that bad, or that they like X a lot, or that  they can't see X at all. 

And they don't seem to be providing this information for general cultural reasons, but in denial that the original person is "correct" to feel the way they do in the first place.

It's something I've seen repeatedly, that if unhappy people would just stop being unhappy then everything would be fine.  That they shouldn't complain about people doing things they don't like - because if they'd just learn to like people doing things they didn't like then nothing would have to change, and everyone would be happy.

You don't have to agree with people who complain - if you feel differently then you feel differently.  You don't have to stop doing the thing they feel unhappy about - that's your judgement to make.  But to hear people expressing their feelings on something and then express anger, disbelief or scorn because they have those feelings strikes me as a basic lack of empathy.

It's an attitude that completely baffles me.

Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa

[identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com 2009-07-16 10:49 am (UTC)(link)
I think that's probably a separate matter. I also think people who, I dunno, cry at TV adverts are over-sensitive - and I'm one of them. Or people who cry when bugs are killed, but see my post about the bee the other day.

Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa

[identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com 2009-07-16 11:32 am (UTC)(link)
I was trying to avoid saying "egocentric". It's not all about you.

Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa

[identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com 2009-07-16 11:42 am (UTC)(link)
Pulling a quote from a while back:

However, your views on what constitutes a spoiler are such that I think you're being overly sensitive.

Your emotional reaction to being told the ending of a film is most definitely about you.

Your expectation that people should necessarily change their behaviour to avoid upsetting you, regardless of other concerns, would seem to be the epitome of egocentricity.

Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa

[identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com 2009-07-16 11:58 am (UTC)(link)
Yet you make a value judgement about others by describing them as unempathic when what they do doesn't fit with what you'd like them to do!

Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa

[identity profile] wildeabandon.livejournal.com 2009-07-16 12:03 pm (UTC)(link)
He's not describing people who don't do what he wants as unempathic. He's describing people who insist he doesn't or shouldn't feel the way he does as unempathic.
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)

[personal profile] simont 2009-07-16 02:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Can't speak for [livejournal.com profile] nmg, but the comment in your original post "To me, spoilers are all about politeness" certainly made me think your aim was to ask people to behave in a particular way: the implication was that posting spoilers is impolite, and usually statements like "X is impolite" do carry an implicit "so please don't do X, on the basis of our presumably-shared assumption that being polite is generally a good thing".

In the next paragraph, "And I'd really appreciate you not telling me the details before I do!" also sounded very like a request, even an emphatic one.

Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa

[identity profile] wildeabandon.livejournal.com 2009-07-16 11:34 am (UTC)(link)
I think that if you're sufficiently sensitive that you are frequently upset by people doing things that you can't reasonably expect them not to do then you're over-sensitive. That's not a criticism, it's just that getting upset frequently is bad.

I also think that many people who get upset by things that they can't reasonably expect people not to do nonetheless expect people not to do them, or encourage them to feel guilty if they do*, and that is what people are usually referring to when they call someone over-sensitive as a criticism.

As a more general response to your post, it is sometimes possible to change how much something upsets you, and pointing this out is not the same as saying that it doesn't upset you now.

*I'm not saying that you're doing that, talking in generalities here.

Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa

[identity profile] wildeabandon.livejournal.com 2009-07-16 11:51 am (UTC)(link)
For some definition of "reasonable".
Right, and obviously that's dependent on the people involved and the context and so on, but it's not entirely subjective in the way that an emotional response is.

In which case advice on how to do this would seem to be the answer.
Agreed. I mean, people were doing that, but it would be better if they did it from a "you might find it less of a problem if you looked at it this way" than a "your way of doing it is mechanistic and inferior, mine is way better".

Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa

[identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com 2009-07-16 01:06 pm (UTC)(link)
"I don't believe people can be "too sensitive"."

People can be too anything. If people can be so sensitive so that it impairs their day to day living I would say that is too much. Off course you'd probably need a hell of a long tail to find such a person put there you go...

To risk, unintended but I feel it could be interpreted as such so please excuse me if I've gone and been a product of white male middle class priviledge again, misogyny: Clearly to an extent we do belive some people can be "too sensitive" - I'd say that narratives of HRT for menopausal women include bits about emotional stability. Obviously the argument here is that increased sensitivity (at the extreme) leads to emotional instability.

Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa

[identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com 2009-07-16 01:11 pm (UTC)(link)
You can pretty much take that when I say "impairs day to day living" (or functioning) I mean in a pretty serious regard. As in this person is unable to do things that the majority of society take for granted most days.