andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2009-07-15 10:58 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Empathic Failure
One of the strange attitudes on the spoilers post is that of people who seem insistent on telling me how I should enjoy movies. That I pay too much attention to plot, or that I just shouldn't enjoy a movie less if I know how it's going to turn out.
This seems to be a common thread in discussion on the internet - one person says "I don't like X." and a bunch of people say that not enjoying X is immature, or that it's not that bad, or that they like X a lot, or that they can't see X at all.
And they don't seem to be providing this information for general cultural reasons, but in denial that the original person is "correct" to feel the way they do in the first place.
It's something I've seen repeatedly, that if unhappy people would just stop being unhappy then everything would be fine. That they shouldn't complain about people doing things they don't like - because if they'd just learn to like people doing things they didn't like then nothing would have to change, and everyone would be happy.
You don't have to agree with people who complain - if you feel differently then you feel differently. You don't have to stop doing the thing they feel unhappy about - that's your judgement to make. But to hear people expressing their feelings on something and then express anger, disbelief or scorn because they have those feelings strikes me as a basic lack of empathy.
It's an attitude that completely baffles me.
This seems to be a common thread in discussion on the internet - one person says "I don't like X." and a bunch of people say that not enjoying X is immature, or that it's not that bad, or that they like X a lot, or that they can't see X at all.
And they don't seem to be providing this information for general cultural reasons, but in denial that the original person is "correct" to feel the way they do in the first place.
It's something I've seen repeatedly, that if unhappy people would just stop being unhappy then everything would be fine. That they shouldn't complain about people doing things they don't like - because if they'd just learn to like people doing things they didn't like then nothing would have to change, and everyone would be happy.
You don't have to agree with people who complain - if you feel differently then you feel differently. You don't have to stop doing the thing they feel unhappy about - that's your judgement to make. But to hear people expressing their feelings on something and then express anger, disbelief or scorn because they have those feelings strikes me as a basic lack of empathy.
It's an attitude that completely baffles me.
Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa
This is, by the way, one of the things that's getting to me a bit. I don't believe people can be "too sensitive". People may be more or less sensitive than each other, but I don't believe that any particular level of sensitivity is "right".
(Not having a go at you specifically, you're just the fourth person to say it today)
Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa
Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa
And I don't think that's over-sensitive. "Over" implies some level that's right, and I can't see how you'd set a baseline.
Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa
Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa
What?
Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa
Your emotional reaction to being told the ending of a film is most definitely about you.
Your expectation that people should necessarily change their behaviour to avoid upsetting you, regardless of other concerns, would seem to be the epitome of egocentricity.
Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa
But I don't think that. I don't remember saying that either. I've said repeatedly, in both posts, that that choice is down to the individual.
Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa
Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa
Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa
I described then as unempathic when their reaction to me saying "I don't enjoy X" was "You're doing it wrong, you emo wuss." - showing a lack of understanding that my emotions were different to theirs, and not because of some problem with me, but because people are different.
Responses of "You may not enjoy X, but I'm fine with it." didn't bother me at all.
At no point did I call people unempathic because they didn't do what I said. Particularly because I never told anyone what to do.
I'm wondering what I did to be quite so misunderstood by you. Can you point out which bits made you believe I was telling you what to do?
no subject
In the next paragraph, "And I'd really appreciate you not telling me the details before I do!" also sounded very like a request, even an emphatic one.
no subject
And yes, I believe that if X makes someone unhappy, then it is polite to not do X. I do not believe that politeness is always the correct thing to do - I'm fine with people choosing to be impolite.
Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa
I also think that many people who get upset by things that they can't reasonably expect people not to do nonetheless expect people not to do them, or encourage them to feel guilty if they do*, and that is what people are usually referring to when they call someone over-sensitive as a criticism.
As a more general response to your post, it is sometimes possible to change how much something upsets you, and pointing this out is not the same as saying that it doesn't upset you now.
*I'm not saying that you're doing that, talking in generalities here.
Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa
For some definition of "reasonable".
I agree entirely with your second paragraph.
it is sometimes possible to change how much something upsets you
In which case advice on how to do this would seem to be the answer.
Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa
Right, and obviously that's dependent on the people involved and the context and so on, but it's not entirely subjective in the way that an emotional response is.
In which case advice on how to do this would seem to be the answer.
Agreed. I mean, people were doing that, but it would be better if they did it from a "you might find it less of a problem if you looked at it this way" than a "your way of doing it is mechanistic and inferior, mine is way better".
Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa
And yes :->
Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa
People can be too anything. If people can be so sensitive so that it impairs their day to day living I would say that is too much. Off course you'd probably need a hell of a long tail to find such a person put there you go...
To risk, unintended but I feel it could be interpreted as such so please excuse me if I've gone and been a product of white male middle class priviledge again, misogyny: Clearly to an extent we do belive some people can be "too sensitive" - I'd say that narratives of HRT for menopausal women include bits about emotional stability. Obviously the argument here is that increased sensitivity (at the extreme) leads to emotional instability.
Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa
Depends on how much it impairs it. I mean, my day would be better if I wasn't sensitive to idiots saying stupid things, but it's not such a massive impairment that I fancy seeking help with it :->
Similarly, emotional stability is a personal matter too. Everyone is a bit unstable, or we wouldnt have emotion reactions at all. What level of instability we're happy with is for us to decide.
I think that choices about sensitivity levels are personal - there's no _global_ bar for sensitivity, there's what individuals are comfortable with.
Re: probably repeating things that have already been said, but can't be bothered transplanting my sa