andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2009-07-12 12:01 pm
Entry tags:

Delicious LiveJournal Links for 7-12-2009

office 2010

[identity profile] aitkendrum.livejournal.com 2009-07-12 11:42 am (UTC)(link)
MS have too much cash!

[identity profile] randomchris.livejournal.com 2009-07-12 11:50 am (UTC)(link)
I really can't tell if that last one is genuine or a send-up. Anyone?

[identity profile] stillcarl.livejournal.com 2009-07-12 12:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Mindreader: I won twice and lost twice, the difference being I won by 1 and 2 but lost by 7 and 15. I suspect you could get good at it though - assuming it doesn't cheat at all.

[identity profile] meico.livejournal.com 2009-07-12 04:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Office 2010 The Movie

I threw up into my mouth a little.

I reminded me of the time a compnay I worked for got taken over by another and the head of that compnay came to our offices and told us, "We're cool, see- no tie." while he stood in a full suit with loafers and all, but with a black t-shirt underneath his suit.

I threw up into my mouth a little then too.

[identity profile] heron61.livejournal.com 2009-07-12 08:48 pm (UTC)(link)
It's not really that hard to win Mindreader - my best strategy was to do a short sequence of all 1 or all 0 followed by switching when the computer caught up.
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)

[personal profile] simont 2009-07-13 01:40 pm (UTC)(link)
I was suspicious of Mindreader after it won handily on effectively random data: I entered the binary expansion of pi, and then (in case the former had been a special case it knew about) that of pi*e/phi. However, I downloaded its source code and tested it in an environment where I could be sure it wasn't cheating, and it appears it did legitimately get lucky on those two sequences. It loses on sqrt(2) :-)