[identity profile] bracknellexile.livejournal.com 2009-06-03 10:44 am (UTC)(link)
Can't condone racism but it's definitely a case of, "If you curtail someone else's free speech just because you don't like what they're saying, don't be surprised when someone curtails yours."

[identity profile] meihua.livejournal.com 2009-06-03 10:46 am (UTC)(link)
Dude! Book snap! :D

[identity profile] zornhau.livejournal.com 2009-06-03 11:49 am (UTC)(link)
...especially if you're in a minority.

"They came for the skinheads, and I laughed. Then they came for the Goths..."

[identity profile] heron61.livejournal.com 2009-06-03 10:46 am (UTC)(link)
From my PoV, racism is very bad, but so is policing speach inside people's homes. Enforcing it in any useful way also requires a very scary surveillance state.
zz: (Default)

[personal profile] zz 2009-06-03 11:02 am (UTC)(link)
racist conversations are good - they're the only way to work out who to blame for all the world's ills.
Edited 2009-06-03 11:02 (UTC)

[identity profile] nancylebov.livejournal.com 2009-06-03 11:14 am (UTC)(link)
I can't imagine how a book could represent me.

Is the question about racist conversations at home in reference to something?

[identity profile] khbrown.livejournal.com 2009-06-03 11:27 am (UTC)(link)
How would racist conversation in the home be policed? As others have said, it would seem to imply or necessitate an (even more) excessive degree of surveillance. And why racism specifically? Why not sexist, ageist, ableist, gender identity/sexual identity and religiously intolerant conversation as well.

[identity profile] a-pawson.livejournal.com 2009-06-03 11:36 am (UTC)(link)
Making racist conversations illegal would require first defining exactly what is and is not racist. I imagine that would be a nigh on impossible task. If you asked 100 people if certain things were or were not racist, you would get a wide variation of opinion.

[identity profile] aliiis.livejournal.com 2009-06-03 02:43 pm (UTC)(link)
If it were illegal to express racist opinions then how would racists find out they were wrong? That sort of thing.

The ONE book question really is just unanswerable though, for me anyway! I picked one that started me thinking about a lot of different things which are very very important to me right now, but a lot of my life (and interests - such as linguistics, etc) had already happened by then.

[identity profile] cheekbones3.livejournal.com 2009-06-03 05:12 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't really understand what you mean by "represent me". There are books I like, and some a like a lot, but should a book I like represent me? Should it be one that illustrates my personality or philosophy?

[identity profile] meihua.livejournal.com 2009-06-03 05:41 pm (UTC)(link)
I picked a book which had a big influence on me.

[identity profile] cheekbones3.livejournal.com 2009-06-03 07:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmm, as much as I love reading, I can't think of any book that's influenced me per se.

[identity profile] rhythmaning.livejournal.com 2009-06-03 10:14 pm (UTC)(link)
I could equally well have chosen the Alexandria Quartet (24) or On the Road (20).

[identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com 2009-06-03 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I think it's interesting that people are choosing dystopian fiction and WW2 satire to 'represent them'. It suggests to me that you're getting variable interpretations - you state in your later post that what you were expecting here was a 'defining novel'. The book I choose to best represent me is not the one I would choose as my 'defining novel'. I suspect the same would be even truer for, say, Erin.
darkoshi: (Default)

[personal profile] darkoshi 2009-06-04 02:12 am (UTC)(link)
I can't think of what is meant by a book that represents me. There are various books in which I've felt resonance between me and the characters. There are various books that have felt special to me at various times and which bit by bit have defined parts of my life. But a single book would just be a part of my past, a part of my life experience. I don't think I even remember most of the books I've read.