andrewducker: (xkcd boomdeyada)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2009-04-25 04:45 pm

Speeding Fines

[livejournal.com profile] octopoid_horror let me know about the Finnish system of administering speeding fines:
KPH over the speed limit x daily salary.

So if you're 10KPH over the speed limit and earn hundreds of thousands of pounds a year, then you're in for quite a large fine.

Apparently this is how all reasonable sized fines work in Finland - they're expressed in days of pay.

I'm in favour.

[identity profile] chuma.livejournal.com 2009-04-26 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
"Checking my mirrors and clearing my blind spot before changing lanes take more attention than my spedometer, and it would be a hell of a lot more dangerous to NOT do those."

And people often cross the rooad when you overtake on these duel carriageways? No.

"And the difference between your deliberately going 20 over and accidentally going 23 isn't that big a deal"

Sadly because Andy Ducker likes to get people to post on his LJ and not actually post legitimate comment, he didn't mention that all these details were readily available on the finnish governmental website which I just looked at. And the difference between 20 and 23 KPH? Well.... a business man just got a mention in their equivilent of th house of commons. You see this fine actually doesnt apply until you have 20KPH over the limit. Until then, it is a 110 Euro fine. So because he was 2 more KPh over the limit, instead of 110... he was charged 118,000 Euros. Now how is THAT fair exactly?

[identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com 2009-04-26 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
And people often cross the rooad when you overtake on these duel carriageways? No.

I suspect you are working from a deeply *different* theory of motorised travel than I am.

Is it nice in 1930, where you live?

Now how is THAT fair exactly?

You appear to once again be deliberately ignoring my point: Fees dependent on the ability of the criminal to pay are more fair than set fees, even if the specifics aren't quite to our liking.

[identity profile] chuma.livejournal.com 2009-04-26 03:55 am (UTC)(link)
You claim I am deliberately ignoring your point, but completely ignoerd my last paragraph. How selective of you.

I AGREE that means paying is better than fixed fines. Do I have to repeat myself in every single thread with you? My problem is that the finnish scheme is utterly fucked up and actually worse than the UK scheme due to the way it is implemented.

"Is it nice in 1930, where you live?"

Keep those strawman arguments going; they are working so well for you right now....

[identity profile] johncoxon.livejournal.com 2009-04-26 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
€118000?! What? I'll take this 'unfair' Britain any day.
Edited 2009-04-26 01:47 (UTC)

[identity profile] chuma.livejournal.com 2009-04-26 03:56 am (UTC)(link)
I got the figure wrong in retrospect - it was 112,000 but point still valid. Have a read.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day-fine

[identity profile] lpetrazickis.livejournal.com 2009-04-26 05:33 am (UTC)(link)
And people often cross the rooad when you overtake on these duel carriageways? No.

People cross the road while I change lanes about as often as they cross the road while I check the speedometer.

Perhaps this is a North America thing. Our roads have a lot of lanes. There's plenty of jaywalking on 4-lane and even 6-lane streets in Toronto.

[identity profile] chuma.livejournal.com 2009-04-26 11:44 am (UTC)(link)
In fairness mate, be your own admission, you set up extremes to create debat on your LJ.

[identity profile] chuma.livejournal.com 2009-04-26 12:09 pm (UTC)(link)
In that case I apologise.