andrewducker: (witch)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2009-03-14 10:59 am

World Of Julie

Julie: Don't ever buy me a hundred red roses.
Andy: *stares at Julie, trying to work out under what circumstances he might have even considered doing that*
Julie: Just give me the two hundred and fifty pounds.

[identity profile] ishkhara.livejournal.com 2009-03-14 11:22 am (UTC)(link)
A practical girl. *nod nod* :)

[identity profile] the-locster.livejournal.com 2009-03-14 11:33 am (UTC)(link)
The whole floral industry is pretty weird really, a vast amount of productive land and resources go into producing flowers. Here's an idea (to the world in genberal, I'm not having a personal dig), if you like flowers then grow then in your garden or window box!

[identity profile] fetket.livejournal.com 2009-03-14 12:27 pm (UTC)(link)
hmmm .... a dozen for 3.99... £35.91 from Salisbury... however my wife would probably prefer a really good meal out for that... I think if I spent £250 on roses she'd probably beat me with every single one of them...

... so not necessarily a ...

anyway she'd be upset not romantically inclined.

[identity profile] dapperscavenger.livejournal.com 2009-03-14 12:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I got my mum a fruit basket for Mother's Day. At least that's useful.

[identity profile] captainlucy.livejournal.com 2009-03-14 02:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Aah, eminently sensible. :)

[identity profile] pisica.livejournal.com 2009-03-14 03:30 pm (UTC)(link)
*nods* :D

[identity profile] khbrown.livejournal.com 2009-03-14 07:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Roses = Romance

Not. Put land to productive use instead!

Here are some potatoes, or onions, or whatever, darling...
zz: (Default)

[personal profile] zz 2009-03-14 08:56 pm (UTC)(link)
would she still want money instead of one rose? if not, where's the crossover between wanting roses and money? :>