andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2009-02-15 03:30 pm
Entry tags:

Delicious LiveJournal Links for 2-15-2009

[identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com 2009-02-15 06:26 pm (UTC)(link)
re: HTML tags:

<wbr> isn't part of any of the standards.

<q> doesn't insert quotations - that's for the :before and :after pseudo-elements and the content property in CSS). The problem re: IE is not that it doesn't support q, but that it doesn't implement all of CSS2.

<bdo> is used when mixing rtl and ltr text in the same document. The author of the blog post has never had to typeset Hebrew or Arabic fragments alongside English (etc).

A bit of a sloppy article, unfortunately.
Edited 2009-02-15 18:27 (UTC)

[identity profile] drjon.livejournal.com 2009-02-15 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)
This.

(I didn't know only one, but thanks for the link!)

[identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com 2009-02-16 11:12 am (UTC)(link)
Introducing people to non-standard markup is wrong, as the browser wars of the 1990s demonstrated. This is why widely-implemented open standards are crucial to the continued success of the Web.

Encouraging people to expect non-standard functionality is unhelpful and counter-productive. If you've come to expect that browser X behaves a certain way (going beyond the behaviour prescribed in the specs) when presented with certain markup, there's a tendency to assume that it is required behaviour. This sort of thinking is responsible for the common misconception that links are blue.