andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2009-02-15 03:30 pm
Entry tags:

Delicious LiveJournal Links for 2-15-2009

[identity profile] miss-s-b.livejournal.com 2009-02-15 03:34 pm (UTC)(link)
I know and use the first two of those HTML tags, and know but don't use the last. The other two would probably not be much use to me.
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)

[personal profile] matgb 2009-02-15 03:47 pm (UTC)(link)
IAWTC. And I taught her the first one. Plus the second I have styled on my LJ specifically as it's useful and it's the default for the "quote" button on LJ replies in most of the layouts.

[identity profile] supergee.livejournal.com 2009-02-15 04:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Brings back memories of all the brain damage LSD did to people who didn't take it. Somehow we never got that generation of kids born with nonstandard numbers of limbs and such because their parents had dabbled in the filthy stuff.

[identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com 2009-02-15 06:26 pm (UTC)(link)
re: HTML tags:

<wbr> isn't part of any of the standards.

<q> doesn't insert quotations - that's for the :before and :after pseudo-elements and the content property in CSS). The problem re: IE is not that it doesn't support q, but that it doesn't implement all of CSS2.

<bdo> is used when mixing rtl and ltr text in the same document. The author of the blog post has never had to typeset Hebrew or Arabic fragments alongside English (etc).

A bit of a sloppy article, unfortunately.
Edited 2009-02-15 18:27 (UTC)

[identity profile] drjon.livejournal.com 2009-02-15 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)
This.

(I didn't know only one, but thanks for the link!)

[identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com 2009-02-16 11:12 am (UTC)(link)
Introducing people to non-standard markup is wrong, as the browser wars of the 1990s demonstrated. This is why widely-implemented open standards are crucial to the continued success of the Web.

Encouraging people to expect non-standard functionality is unhelpful and counter-productive. If you've come to expect that browser X behaves a certain way (going beyond the behaviour prescribed in the specs) when presented with certain markup, there's a tendency to assume that it is required behaviour. This sort of thinking is responsible for the common misconception that links are blue.

[identity profile] d-c-m.livejournal.com 2009-02-15 08:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Love the anchors and the HTML!! Thanks. :)