andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2009-01-05 12:25 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
My brain, it hurts
Off work today - was up coughing half the night. Why haven't they cured disease yet?
Anyway - following
lizbee's post comparing the looks of Henry VIII and Prince William Julie asked me which of his children survived, so I went digging into Henry VIII - and was amused to discover that three of his four children became rulers of the country. Is this a record? Does it take a uniquely English fucked-up-ness to achieve this kind of thing?
Anyway - following
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
There were some threes before the conquest (according to wikipedia), but no others afterwards. Henry still feels like the winner, though, for having such a quick succession of children (including, in some sense, Jane), followed by Elizabeth.
Pre-conquest:
* Ethelbald, Ethelbert, Ethelred, Alfred the Great
* Elfward, Athelstan the Glorious, Edmund the Magnificent, Eadred
* Saint Edward the Martyr, Ethelred the Unready
* Harold Harefoot, Harthacanute
* Edmund Ironside, Saint Edward the Confessor (Half brothers, Edmund was deposed by the Danish, and Edmund apparently from his half-brother through his mother). Hence:
* Harthacanute, Saint Edward the Confessor
Post-conquest, things settle a little:
* William II & Henry I
* Henry the Young King, Richard I, John Softsword[1]
* Henry VI, Henry VI (if you count single children who obtain the throne twice)
* Edward IV, Edward IV, Richard III (ditto)
* Edward VI, Mary, Elizabeth
* Charles II, James II
* Mary II, Anne
* George IV, William IV
* Edward VIII, George VI
[1] I mean, seriously, did this guy have the worst PR or what? "Bad", "Lackland", and now "Softsword"! :)
no subject