andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2008-12-26 03:30 pm
Entry tags:

Delicious LiveJournal Links for 12-26-2008

[identity profile] meaningrequired.livejournal.com 2008-12-26 04:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Link 1 -

I actually think this should be taken with less salt :) Although, its a bit of a revolving cycle; when a man adores a woman, he will think shes got great personality, sense of human, is more beautiful (than the rest of the world perceives).

[identity profile] meaningrequired.livejournal.com 2008-12-26 04:49 pm (UTC)(link)
But of course, I know that :P

[identity profile] bracknellexile.livejournal.com 2008-12-26 04:55 pm (UTC)(link)
*wonders what a "sense of human" is* :)

[identity profile] meaningrequired.livejournal.com 2008-12-26 04:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Whoops. Sense of humour.

I think we should release perfume "Sense of Human" :D

[identity profile] bracknellexile.livejournal.com 2008-12-26 04:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Surely that's Scents of Human - although admittedly not all scents of human are that pleasant :)

As for the charity article:

[identity profile] sterlingspider.livejournal.com 2008-12-26 06:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I was involved in a volunteer run, not-for-profit group running a sci-fi convention for about a decade, finally leaving after a five or so year stint on the BOD and a two year run as the Event Coordinator. After a very short time in that sort of position a few things make themselves painfully obvious.

Pretty much the only motivation/reward a volunteer has is the knowledge of a job well done, and the only "hiring" criteria is a willingness to (say they are going to) do a particular job.

There is absolutely no accountability whatsoever, and so in this one instance shit actually rolls uphill.

If a volunteer is MIA their job falls to the organizers or doesn't get done. If they don't think a particular aspect of a job is important it falls to the organizers or doesn't get done. If they are inept the job falls to the organizers or doesn't get done (as well as mitigating any resulting aftermath). "Firing" volunteers often royally pisses off the other volunteers and generally means starting over from scratch on whatever they were doing (potentially without critical materials they may have taken with them).

In every instance except the top tier of organizers (who are generally where they are because they are both some manner of obsessive masochist and were probably the only people to actually do their jobs well when they started out) you get exactly what you pay for.

So while Dan Pallotta's income may have been nearly double the full budget of my convention, as long as the practices of the charity were well advertised, the people in the organization treated well, and the spirit of the event in the right place I say he's welcome to it.

(sorry about the edits)
Edited 2008-12-26 18:14 (UTC)